This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Recombinase Aided Amplification (RAA) coupled with lateral flow strips (LFS) for the point-of-care detection of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV).
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Recombinase Aided Amplification (RAA) coupled with lateral flow strips (LFS) for the point-of-care detection of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV). Tailored for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, we explore the foundational principles of this isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology, detail the methodological workflow for assay development and application, address critical troubleshooting and optimization strategies, and present a rigorous validation and comparative analysis with established diagnostic techniques. The content synthesizes current research to highlight how RAA-strip assays offer a rapid, sensitive, and field-deployable solution for ASF control, bridging the gap between laboratory-based PCR and on-site diagnostic needs.
African Swine Fever (ASF) represents one of the most significant threats to global swine production, with mortality rates approaching 100% in affected herds and no commercially available vaccine or treatment [1]. The causative agent, African swine fever virus (ASFV), is a large, complex DNA virus that manifests with clinical signs often indistinguishable from other porcine hemorrhagic diseases, particularly Classical Swine Fever (CSF) [2] [1]. In the absence of effective vaccines, control measures rely exclusively on early detection, rapid diagnosis, and implementation of strict biosecurity measures to contain outbreaks [3]. Traditional laboratory-based diagnostic methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), require sophisticated instrumentation, trained personnel, and controlled laboratory environments, creating critical delays between sample collection and diagnostic decisions [4] [5]. These delays facilitate silent ASFV transmission, particularly in remote or resource-limited settings where laboratory infrastructure is inaccessible [5].
The development and deployment of point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests address this critical diagnostic gap by enabling rapid detection directly in field settings. Among emerging POC technologies, recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) coupled with lateral flow test strips (RAA-strip) represents a transformative approach for ASFV detection [2] [4]. This isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique operates at constant low temperatures (37-42°C) and delivers results within 20-30 minutes, eliminating the need for thermal cyclers and complex DNA extraction procedures [4] [6]. The integration of RAA with lateral flow detection provides visual, easy-to-interpret results comparable to rapid antigen tests, but with the sensitivity and specificity of molecular methods [4] [6]. This Application Note details the implementation of RAA-strip assays for ASFV detection, providing validated protocols, performance characteristics, and practical guidance for researchers and outbreak responders.
Recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique that utilizes three core enzymatic activities to exponentially amplify target DNA sequences: a recombinase that facilitates primer binding to homologous sequences, single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSB) that stabilize displaced DNA strands, and DNA polymerase that extends primers from the 3' end [4] [6]. The reaction occurs rapidly at constant temperatures of 37-42°C, making it ideal for field-deployable platforms [6]. When combined with lateral flow detection (RAA-strip), the assay provides visual confirmation of pathogen detection through immunocapture of labeled amplification products [4] [6].
The RAA-strip detection mechanism employs specially designed primers and probes labeled with complementary reporter molecules. During amplification, the RAA probe incorporates a 5'-FAM (fluorescein) label and a 3'-biotin tag, separated by a tetrahydrofuran (THF) abasic site moiety [6]. The 5' to 3' exonuclease activity of the DNA polymerase cleaves the probe at the THF site when it hybridizes to the target sequence, releasing the FAM label from the biotin tag [4]. The dual-labeled amplicons are then detected on a lateral flow strip containing two predefined zones: a test line coated with streptavidin that captures biotinylated amplicons, and a control line with anti-FAM antibodies that capture free anti-FAM antibody-gold conjugates [6]. A positive result is indicated by visible bands at both the test and control lines, while a negative sample shows only a control band [6].
Figure 1: RAA-Strip POC Workflow for ASFV Detection. The complete diagnostic process from sample to result can be completed in approximately 30 minutes with minimal equipment requirements. Key steps include simple sample processing, isothermal amplification, and lateral flow detection. RT = room temperature.
The implementation of RAA-strip assays requires specific reagents and components that ensure optimal amplification and detection efficiency. The table below details essential research-grade reagents and their functions in the ASFV RAA-strip detection system.
Table 1: Essential Research Reagents for ASFV RAA-Strip Assays
| Component | Function | Specifications | Commercial Source Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAA Basic Kit | Provides core amplification enzymes | Contains recombinase (UvsX), SSB protein, DNA polymerase in lyophilized form | Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology |
| RAA Fluorescence Kit | Enables real-time detection | Includes exo-probe with FAM/BHQ labels | Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology |
| RAA Lateral Flow Kit | Supports strip-based detection | Includes nfo-probe with FAM/biotin labels | Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology |
| Primer Sets | Target-specific amplification | 30-35 bp length, targeting ASFV B646L (p72) gene | Custom-designed, HPLC purified |
| Lateral Flow Strips | Visual result readout | Streptavidin test line, anti-FAM control line | Commercial test strip manufacturers |
| Magnesium Acetate | Reaction initiation | 280 mM solution added to initiate RAA | Included in RAA kits |
The ASFV RAA-strip assay demonstrates exceptional analytical sensitivity, capable of detecting remarkably low concentrations of viral nucleic acids. Multiple studies have consistently shown detection limits of approximately 10 copies/μL for recombinant plasmids containing ASFV target sequences [2] [4]. This sensitivity exceeds that of conventional PCR methods recommended by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), which typically detect 100 copies/μL [4]. When testing viral DNA extracted from clinical samples, the RAA-strip assay achieves detection limits of 10-12 pg of total nucleic acid input, making it suitable for identifying early infections when viral loads are still low [2]. The exceptional sensitivity is maintained even with simplified sample preparation methods, with studies reporting consistent detection in blood samples diluted only 2-4 fold, whereas PCR requires 32-64 fold dilutions to overcome inhibitors present in blood matrices [4].
The specificity of ASFV RAA-strip assays has been rigorously evaluated against a panel of common swine pathogens to assess cross-reactivity potential. Multiple independent studies confirm no cross-reactivity with Classical Swine Fever Virus (CSFV), Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV), Pseudorabies Virus (PRV), or Porcine Circovirus 2 (PCV2) [2] [4]. This discrimination is critical for differential diagnosis in field settings where these pathogens cause similar clinical presentations. The high specificity is achieved through careful primer design targeting conserved regions of ASFV genes, particularly the B646L gene encoding the major capsid protein p72, which contains both conserved regions for reliable detection and variable regions for differentiation from other pathogens [1].
Clinical validation studies demonstrate excellent concordance between RAA-strip assays and established reference methods. In evaluations using 37-42 clinical samples, RAA-strip assays showed positive concordance rates of 94.1% with conventional PCR for ASFV detection [2]. One comprehensive study reported 100% concordance with OIE-recommended PCR when testing both extracted DNA and minimally processed blood samples from clinical cases [4]. The RAA-strip format has proven particularly effective for direct detection in blood samples, where PCR inhibition often reduces sensitivity. The robust performance in complex clinical matrices without extensive nucleic acid purification makes the technology ideally suited for point-of-care applications where laboratory-grade DNA extraction is impractical.
Table 2: Performance Comparison of ASFV Detection Methods
| Parameter | RAA-Strip | Conventional PCR | Real-time PCR | Virus Isolation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection Limit | 10 copies/μL [4] | 100 copies/μL [4] | 10 copies/μL [1] | Viable virus required |
| Time to Result | 20-30 min [4] | 2-4 hours | 1-2 hours | 5-7 days |
| Equipment Needs | Simple heater/water bath | Thermal cycler | Real-time PCR instrument | BSL-3 laboratory |
| Skill Level | Low | Moderate | High | High |
| Cost per Test | Low | Moderate | High | High |
| POC Applicability | Excellent | Poor | Poor | Poor |
Principle: This protocol describes a simplified procedure for detecting ASFV in whole blood samples without nucleic acid extraction, optimized for point-of-care use [4].
Materials and Reagents:
Procedure:
RAA Reaction Mix Preparation:
Amplification:
Lateral Flow Detection:
Result Interpretation:
Principle: This protocol enables simultaneous detection and differentiation of ASFV and CSFV in a single reaction tube, with amplification products visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis [2].
Materials and Reagents:
Procedure:
Multiplex RAA Reaction:
Product Analysis:
Expected Results:
The successful deployment of RAA-strip tests in field settings requires careful consideration of several practical factors beyond analytical performance. Sample collection and stabilization represent critical initial steps, with whole blood, spleen, and lymph nodes being optimal specimens for ASFV detection [5]. In remote areas with limited cold chain capacity, sample preservation alternatives such as filter paper blood drying (FTA cards) or formol-glycerosaline preservation enable extended storage and safe transport without refrigeration [5]. These approaches maintain nucleic acid integrity while reducing biohazard risks during transportation from field to testing sites.
Environmental stability of RAA reagents presents another crucial consideration for field deployment. Lyophilized RAA reagents demonstrate excellent thermal stability, maintaining efficacy for 4-6 months at 4°C and several weeks at room temperature [2] [7]. This stability profile surpasses that of conventional PCR reagents, which typically require consistent freezing. The minimal equipment requirements â essentially a simple heating device maintaining 37-39°C â further enhance field applicability, as amplification can be performed using portable water baths, battery-powered heating blocks, or even body heat in extreme resource-limited scenarios [4].
Figure 2: RAA Molecular Mechanism. The core RAA components work in concert to enable rapid isothermal amplification. Recombinase-primer complexes scan double-stranded DNA, facilitating strand invasion and D-loop formation stabilized by SSB proteins. DNA polymerase then initiates exponential amplification from the 3'-OH of the primer.
The development and validation of RAA-strip assays for ASFV detection represent a significant advancement in point-of-care diagnostics for animal health. This technology successfully addresses critical limitations of conventional laboratory-based methods by providing rapid, sensitive, and specific detection in field settings with minimal infrastructure requirements [2] [4]. The simplicity of the protocol â requiring only sample dilution, heating, amplification, and strip reading â enables deployment by personnel with minimal technical training, expanding testing capabilities to remote smallholder farms and field diagnostic teams [5]. The 30-minute turnaround time from sample to result facilitates immediate implementation of control measures, potentially containing outbreaks before widespread dissemination occurs [5] [1].
Future developments in RAA-strip technology will likely focus on multiplexing capabilities for simultaneous detection of ASFV genotypes and differentiation from other swine pathogens, particularly CSFV [2] [1]. Integration with portable electronic readers could enable quantitative interpretation and digital result recording for outbreak surveillance and reporting [1]. Additionally, ongoing research aims to further simplify sample processing and enhance stability under extreme environmental conditions, potentially enabling room-temperature storage of all assay components [5]. As ASFV continues to evolve and spread globally, accessible, reliable point-of-care diagnostics like RAA-strip assays will play an increasingly vital role in coordinated control efforts, protecting swine populations and supporting the economic stability of pork production systems worldwide.
Recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) is an innovative isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology that enables the rapid amplification of DNA or RNA at a constant low temperature, typically between 37°C to 42°C [8]. This technique serves as a powerful tool for molecular diagnostics, particularly in point-of-care settings, as it eliminates the need for sophisticated and expensive thermal cycling equipment required by conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods [9]. The entire RAA reaction is exceptionally fast, providing amplification results within 5 to 30 minutes [9] [10], making it especially suitable for field applications and rapid diagnostics for pathogens like the African swine fever virus (ASFV).
The fundamental working principle of RAA relies on the coordinated activity of three core components: a recombinase, a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), and a DNA polymerase [8]. These components work in concert to replace the thermal denaturation step of PCR, facilitating exponential amplification of target nucleic acids under isothermal conditions. Recent advancements have integrated RAA with portable detection platforms such as lateral flow assays (LFA) and fluorescent readers, creating comprehensive diagnostic solutions that can be deployed in resource-limited environments for diseases such as ASFV [10] [4].
The RAA process is a meticulously orchestrated molecular dance that enables exponential DNA amplification at a single temperature. The mechanism can be broken down into several key stages, which are visually summarized in the diagram below.
Formation of Primer-Recombinase Complexes: The process initiates when recombinase enzymes, derived from bacteria or fungi, load onto specific primer sequences, forming stable recombinase-primer nucleoprotein filaments [8] [4]. These complexes are then capable of scanning the double-stranded DNA template.
Template Invasion and D-loop Formation: The primer-recombinase complexes actively scan the double-stranded DNA template for homologous sequences. Upon locating the target site, the complex facilitates strand invasion, leading to the displacement of the DNA strand and the formation of a characteristic D-loop structure [4]. This critical step eliminates the requirement for thermal denaturation.
Strand Separation Stabilization: The displaced DNA strand is immediately stabilized and prevented from reannealing by single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSB) [8]. This stabilization maintains the DNA in an open conformation, providing a stable template for the subsequent synthesis step.
DNA Synthesis Initiation: The recombinase disassembles from the primer, leaving the 3'-OH end of the primer accessible to a DNA polymerase, such as the large fragment of B. subtilis Pol I (exonuclease deficient) [11] [8]. The polymerase then initiates synthesis, extending the primer and replicating the target sequence using deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) as building blocks.
Exponential Amplification Cycle: The newly synthesized double-stranded product can subsequently serve as a template for further rounds of recombination and amplification, leading to an exponential increase in the target DNA sequence. This cyclical process enables the detection of as few as 10 copies of target DNA per microliter, demonstrating the high sensitivity of the RAA method [11] [10].
The successful implementation of RAA relies on a specific set of core reagents and can be adapted to various detection formats. The table below details the essential components of a typical RAA reaction system.
Table 1: Core Components of the RAA Reaction System
| Component | Function | Typical Example |
|---|---|---|
| Recombinase | Binds to primers to form a complex that invades double-stranded DNA | Recombinase from bacteria or fungus [8] |
| Single-Stranded Binding Protein (SSB) | Stabilizes the displaced DNA strand, preventing reannealing [8] | Eukaryotic or prokaryotic SSB |
| DNA Polymerase | Synthesizes new DNA strands from the 3' end of primers | Exonuclease-deficient DNA polymerase (e.g., from B. subtilis) [11] |
| Primers | Provide specificity by binding to the target sequence | 30-35 nucleotide oligonucleotides [8] |
| Probe (for fluorescent detection) | Enables real-time detection of amplification; contains a fluorophore and quencher separated by an abasic site (THF) [11] [8] | Oligonucleotide with 5'-FAM, THF, and 3'-Blocking group |
| Deoxyribonucleoside Triphosphates (dNTPs) | Building blocks for new DNA synthesis [8] | dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP |
| Reaction Buffer | Provides optimal pH and salt conditions for enzyme activity | Magnesium acetate-based buffer |
For point-of-care applications, RAA is often paired with simple detection devices. For real-time fluorescent detection, a portable fluorescent reader or a quantitative PCR machine (set to a constant temperature) can be used [11]. For endpoint detection, a lateral flow assay (LFA) is a common choice, requiring no instrumentation for visual readout [10] [4].
Table 2: Common RAA Detection Formats and Requirements
| Detection Format | Key Feature | Required Instrumentation |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time Fluorescent | Quantitative, kinetic monitoring of amplification [11] | Portable fluorescence detector or real-time PCR machine |
| Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) | Visual, yes/no result; highly portable [10] [4] | None (visual inspection) |
| Gel Electrophoresis | Confirmation of amplicon size | Electrophoresis system and gel imager |
African Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly contagious and lethal viral disease of pigs, causing massive economic losses worldwide. As there is no effective commercial vaccine, rapid and early diagnosis is the cornerstone of control strategies [10] [1]. The following protocol details a specific application of RAA combined with a lateral flow assay (LFA) for the point-of-care detection of ASFV, targeting the highly conserved B646L (p72) gene [10] [4].
Sample Preparation (Viral DNA Release)
RAA Amplification Reaction
Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) Readout
The complete workflow from sample to answer is designed for maximum field-applicability, as illustrated below.
The developed RAA-LFA assay for ASFV demonstrates performance characteristics that are critical for a reliable point-of-care test.
Table 3: Performance Metrics of the RAA-LFA for ASFV Detection
| Parameter | Performance | Experimental Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Detection Limit (Sensitivity) | 10 copies/μL [10] | Tested with serial dilutions of a plasmid containing the B646L gene |
| Assay Time | < 30 minutes (total workflow) [10] | Includes sample prep, amplification, and LFA readout |
| Specificity | 100% (No cross-reactivity with CSFV, PRRSV, PEDV, PRV, PCV2) [10] | Tested against other common swine pathogens |
| Clinical Sensitivity | 100% concordance with OIE-recommended PCR [10] | Validation with 37 clinical blood samples |
| Robustness to Inhibitors | Superior to PCR; works with a 2-4 fold blood dilution [10] | PCR requires a 32-64 fold dilution of blood to overcome inhibition |
Recombinase-aided amplification represents a significant advancement in nucleic acid amplification technology, offering a perfect blend of speed, sensitivity, and simplicity. Its ability to operate at a constant temperature makes it inherently suitable for decentralized diagnostics, a feature that is crucial for managing devastating diseases like African swine fever. The synergy of RAA with user-friendly readout systems like lateral flow assays creates a powerful molecular point-of-care testing platform that can deliver actionable results in less than 30 minutes, directly in the field [10] [4]. This empowers veterinarians and farmers to make rapid control decisions, such as immediate culling and movement restrictions, which are vital to contain outbreaks and minimize economic damage. As molecular diagnostics continue to evolve, the core principles of RAAâbypassing thermal cycling through enzymatic machineryâensure its enduring role as a cornerstone technology in the ongoing battle against infectious diseases in both animal and human health.
The rapid and accurate detection of the African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a critical component in managing and controlling this devastating animal disease. Within the broader research on point-of-care (POC) detection, recombinase-aided amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick (RAA-LFD) represents a significant advancement. This methodology enables the visual interpretation of complex molecular diagnostics, making sophisticated testing feasible outside central laboratories. This application note details the mechanism of the lateral flow strip, providing researchers with the protocols and visual guides necessary to implement and understand this powerful detection system.
Following the isothermal amplification of the ASFV target gene (e.g., the p72/B646L gene), the product is applied to a lateral flow strip. The fundamental detection relies on an immunochromatographic assay that captures labeled amplicons on specific zones of the strip.
The typical RAA reaction incorporates a labeled probe, often a FAM-labeled nucleic acid probe, into the amplified DNA product. When this product is applied to the strip, it migrates along the membrane via capillary action. The strip contains two key zones:
The formation of a visible band at the test line indicates a positive result for ASFV. The entire process of interpreting results on the strip can be completed in as little as 5 minutes at room temperature, making it exceptionally suitable for field deployment [12].
Table 1: Key Performance Metrics of Lateral Flow Strip Readouts in ASFV Detection
| Detection Method | Readout Time | Detection Limit | Coincidence with Real-time PCR | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRISPR/Cas13a-LFD | ~60 min (total process) | 101 copies/µL | 100% (83/83 clinical samples) | [13] |
| RAA-LFD | ~5 min (strip readout) | 200 copies/reaction | Not Specified | [12] |
| RAA-Strip (for ASFV/CSFV) | Not Specified | 103 copies/µL | 94.1% (for ASFV, 37-42 samples) | [2] |
| CORDS (Cas12a-based) | ~60 min (total process) | 1 fM (femtomolar) | No cross-reactivity with 13 other swine viruses | [14] |
The following protocol outlines the step-by-step procedure for detecting ASFV using the RAA-LFD method.
The RAA reaction is performed using a commercial kit to amplify the target ASFV p72 gene.
Diagram 1: Lateral flow strip detection mechanism.
Successful implementation of the RAA-LFD assay relies on a suite of specific reagents and instruments.
Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for RAA-LFD
| Item | Function/Description | Example Product/Note |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Kit | Provides core enzymes (recombinase, polymerase) and buffers for isothermal amplification. | ZC Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. or Anhui Microanaly Genetech Co., Ltd. [13] [14] |
| Lateral Flow Strips | Immunochromatographic strip for visual detection of labeled amplicons. | Pre-fabricated strips specific for the label used (e.g., FAM) [13]. |
| Primers & Probes | Designed to target the conserved region of the ASFV p72 (B646L) gene. A FAM-labeled probe is often used for detection [13] [12]. | Custom synthesized by commercial vendors (e.g., Sangon Biotech). |
| DNA Extraction Kit | For purifying viral genomic DNA from complex clinical samples. | Quick-DNA Viral Kit (Magnetic Bead Method) [13] [12]. |
| Nuclease-free Water | Used to prepare reaction mixes, ensuring no enzymatic degradation of reagents. | Molecular biology grade. |
| Constant Temperature Incubator | To maintain the isothermal reaction temperature (37â39 °C) for RAA. | Essential for replacing a thermal cycler [14]. |
| 2-Methoxyethyl laurate | 2-Methoxyethyl laurate, CAS:6309-52-0, MF:C15H30O3, MW:258.40 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
| Cyclohexyl heptanoate | Cyclohexyl heptanoate, CAS:5454-26-2, MF:C13H24O2, MW:212.33 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
The specificity of lateral flow detection can be significantly enhanced by integrating a CRISPR-Cas step. In systems like CRISPR/Cas13a-LFD, the RAA-amplified DNA is first transcribed into RNA. This RNA then activates the Cas13a enzyme, which is pre-complexed with a target-specific crRNA. Upon activation, Cas13a exhibits collateral RNase activity, cleaving a reporter molecule (e.g., a biotin-labeled RNA probe). The cleaved and uncleaved reporters are then differentiated on the lateral flow strip, providing a second layer of specificity with single-base resolution [13] [14].
Diagram 2: CRISPR-Cas13a enhanced LFD workflow.
The diagnosis of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), a disease responsible for massive economic losses in the pig farming industry, is critical for disease surveillance and control [1]. While conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) are standard molecular methods, their reliance on sophisticated thermal cycling equipment limits their use in field settings [10]. Isothermal amplification techniques, which amplify nucleic acids at a constant temperature, have emerged as powerful alternatives for point-of-care testing (POCT) [15]. This application note provides a detailed comparative analysis of Recombinase-Aided Amplification (RAA), highlighting its key advantages in speed, simplicity, and stability over both PCR and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) within the context of developing a rapid ASFV diagnostic strip test.
The core principle of RAA, like other isothermal techniques, eliminates the need for thermal denaturation. It relies on a recombinase that forms filaments with primers and scans double-stranded DNA for homologous sequences, facilitating primer binding and strand displacement synthesis at a constant low temperature (typically 37-42°C) [10]. This fundamental difference from PCR and LAMP underpins its practical benefits for field deployment.
Table 1: Comparative Overview of PCR, LAMP, and RAA Characteristics
| Characteristic | PCR / qPCR | LAMP | RAA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction Temperature | Requires thermal cycling (e.g., 95°C, 60°C, 72°C) [15] | Isothermal (60-65°C) [16] [15] | Isothermal (37-42°C) [10] |
| Reaction Time | ⥠90 minutes [15] | < 30-60 minutes [16] [15] | ~10-20 minutes [10] |
| Equipment Needs | Thermocycler (complex, expensive) [15] | Water bath or heat block (simple) [15] | Water bath or heat block (simple, low temperature) [10] |
| Primer Design | Two primers [17] | 4-6 primers, complex design [17] [16] | Two primers, relatively simple design [10] |
| Sample Preparation | Often requires purified nucleic acids [16] | Tolerant to some inhibitors; crude samples possible [16] [15] | Highly tolerant to inhibitors; works with minimally processed blood [10] |
| Detection Limit (Sensitivity) | Nanogram levels [15] | Femtogram levels; highly sensitive [15] | Can achieve single-copy sensitivity [10] |
| Result Readout | Gel electrophoresis, fluorescence [17] | Turbidity, colorimetry, fluorescence, gel electrophoresis [17] [16] | Easily integrated with lateral flow assay (LFA) for visual readout [10] |
The following protocol is adapted from a study that established a sensitive and specific RAA-LFA for the detection of the ASFV B646L (p72) gene directly from blood samples [10].
Table 2: Essential Materials and Reagents for RAA-LFA
| Item | Function / Description |
|---|---|
| RAA Basic Reaction Kit | Typically contains recombinase, single-stranded DNA-binding protein, strand-displacing DNA polymerase, and reaction buffers. |
| Primers and Probe | Sequence-specific primers and a labeled probe (e.g., FITC and biotin) targeting the ASFV B646L gene. |
| Lateral Flow Strips | Immunochromatographic strips for visual detection, often designed to capture labeled amplicons (e.g., with anti-FITC and control lines). |
| Blood Collection Tubes | For sample acquisition. |
| Nuclease-Free Water | To prevent degradation of reagents and nucleic acids. |
| Heating Block or Water Bath | To maintain a constant temperature of 37°C for the RAA reaction. |
Sample Preparation (5 minutes):
RAA Reaction Mix Preparation (on ice):
Isothermal Amplification (10 minutes):
Lateral Flow Detection (15 minutes):
Diagram 1: RAA-LFA Workflow for ASFV Detection
The comparative data and experimental protocol underscore RAA's superior suitability for ASFV point-of-care detection compared to PCR and LAMP. The key differentiator is RAA's unique combination of low-temperature incubation and high tolerance to inhibitors, which enables a truly sample-to-answer workflow with minimal equipment and hands-on time [10]. While LAMP is also isothermal and rapid, its requirement for a higher reaction temperature (60-65°C) and more complex primer design can be a slight disadvantage in the most resource-limited field scenarios [17] [15].
Diagram 2: Logical Pathway for Selecting RAA for ASFV POC Testing
For researchers and scientists developing point-of-care diagnostics for African Swine Fever, RAA presents a compelling technological platform. Its demonstrated advantages in speed, operational simplicity, and stability with complex samples like blood directly address the critical needs of field-based disease surveillance. By enabling a 30-minute test from raw blood sample to visual result without DNA extraction, the RAA-LFA protocol outlined herein provides a robust, sensitive, and accessible tool that can significantly enhance efforts to control and prevent the spread of ASFV.
African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) is a large, double-stranded DNA virus and the sole member of the Asfarviridae family [18]. This complex pathogen infects domestic pigs and wild boars, causing a hemorrhagic fever with mortality rates approaching 100% in acute cases, posing a severe threat to the global swine industry [18] [19]. The ASFV genome spans approximately 170-193 kbp and encodes between 150-200 proteins, with around 50 of these identified as structural components that form the virus particle and mediate critical stages of infection [18]. These structural proteins serve not only as fundamental building blocks for the virion but also as key targets for diagnostic assay development, vaccine design, and therapeutic interventions. Among these, p72, p54, and p30 have emerged as particularly significant targets for molecular detection platforms, including Recombinase Aided Amplification (RAA) coupled with lateral flow strips, which offer promising solutions for point-of-care (POC) detection of ASFV in field settings.
Table 1: Essential ASFV Structural Proteins for Diagnostic Detection
| Protein | Gene | Biological Function | Expression Kinetics | Diagnostic Utility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p72 | B646L | Major capsid protein; forms viral icosahedral structure; functions as pH sensor during uncoating [18] [20] | Late expression [21] | Gold standard for genotyping; highly conserved target for nucleic acid detection [21] [1] |
| p54 | E183L | Involved in virus attachment and entry; localizes to outer envelope [18] | Early expression [21] | Important antigen for early antibody detection; improves intragenotypic resolution [22] [1] |
| p30 | CP204L | Critical for virus internalization; strong immunogenicity [18] [21] | Early expression (2-4 hours post-infection) [19] [21] | Ideal for early antibody detection; induces high-titer antibodies [21] [22] |
| CD2v | EP402R | Envelope glycoprotein; mediates haemadsorption and immune evasion [21] | Not specified | Key for serological grouping; vaccine candidate [21] |
| pp62 | CP530R | Polyprotein precursor; cleaved to p35 and p15; crucial for core shell assembly [18] | Late expression [18] | Potential marker for infection staging [18] |
The p72 protein, encoded by the B646L gene, serves as the principal component of the ASFV capsid and is highly conserved across different viral isolates [21] [1]. This conservation makes it an excellent target for molecular detection assays. Recent research has revealed that p72 also functions as a sophisticated pH sensor during viral uncoating, with its trimers undergoing depolymerization in the acidic environment of late endosomes (pH ~5-6) to facilitate viral genome release [20]. This pH-sensing capability is attributed to p72's uniquely high histidine content (4.80%), which is significantly greater than that of major capsid proteins in other nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs) [20].
The p54 protein, encoded by the E183L gene, is localized to the viral outer envelope and plays a critical role in viral attachment and entry into host cells [18]. This protein contains a transmembrane domain and a Gly-Gly-X motif, which facilitates its membrane association [18]. As an early expressed antigen with strong immunogenicity, p54 induces neutralizing antibodies, making it a valuable target for early serological diagnosis [22].
The p30 protein, encoded by the CP204L gene, represents one of the most antigenic ASFV structural proteins [19] [21]. It is expressed within 2-4 hours post-infection, with synthesis decreasing after 12 hours, and remains detectable throughout the infection period [19]. This early expression profile, combined with its ability to induce potent neutralizing antibodies, makes p30 particularly suitable for early diagnostic applications [19] [22]. Research demonstrates that p30-specific antibodies can be detected in serum and oral fluid specimens beginning 8-12 days post-infection, providing a critical window for early ASFV identification [22].
Table 2: Genetic Conservation of Key ASFV Targets
| Gene Target | Conservation Level | Variability Considerations | Primary Detection Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| B646L (p72) | Highly conserved across isolates [1] | Basis for 24 known genotypes; point mutations in some strains (e.g., EU Genotype IX) [21] | Nucleic acid detection; genotyping [23] [1] |
| CP204L (p30) | Relatively conserved [21] | Point mutations may affect antibody binding in some strains [21] | Early antibody detection [22] |
| E183L (p54) | Conserved with some variability [1] | Used to improve intragenotypic resolution [1] | Nucleic acid and antibody detection [22] |
| EP402R (CD2v) | Variable [21] | Defines 8 serogroups [1] | Serological grouping; vaccine studies [21] |
| Multigene Families (MGFs) | Highly variable [21] | Recombination in MGF360/505 creates novel strains [21] | Differentiation of recombinant strains [21] |
The B646L gene encoding p72 demonstrates high sequence conservation across ASFV isolates, which underpins its utility as the "gold standard" for ASFV genotyping [23] [1]. To date, 24 distinct ASFV genotypes have been identified based on sequence variations in the C-terminal end of the p72 gene [21] [1]. While this gene is generally stable, recent reports indicate that point mutations in emerging strains like the EU Genotype IX and Asian recombinants may potentially affect antibody binding efficiency in serological assays, highlighting the importance of monitoring genetic drift for assay performance [21].
In contrast, multigene families (MGFs) such as MGF360 and MGF505 represent the most variable regions of the ASFV genome and serve as hotspots for genetic recombination [21]. The emergence of I/II recombinant strains in 2024, characterized by low virulence and high transmissibility, has been attributed to recombination events in these MGF regions [21]. This genetic plasticity presents challenges for molecular detection assays, potentially leading to false negatives if primer/probe binding sites are affected. Therefore, contemporary ASFV detection strategies must account for this variability through careful target selection and assay design.
The detection of ASFV genomic targets typically follows a standardized workflow encompassing sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, target amplification, and result detection [1]. This process is particularly relevant for RAA-strip platforms, which offer rapid, equipment-free detection suitable for point-of-care applications.
Protocol 1: Nucleic Acid Extraction and RAA-Strip Detection
Sample Collection and Preparation:
Nucleic Acid Extraction:
Recombinase Aided Amplification (RAA):
Lateral Flow Strip Detection:
Protocol 2: Indirect ELISA for Antibody Detection Against p30 and p54
Coating ELISA Plates:
Sample Incubation:
Detection and Visualization:
Result Interpretation:
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for ASFV Detection Studies
| Reagent/Catalog Item | Specifications | Research Application | Performance Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinant p72 Protein | N-His tag; full-length B646L gene [21] | ELISA coating antigen; immunogen development [21] | High purity; suitable for serological assays |
| Recombinant p30 Protein | N-Fc tag; CP204L gene [21] | Early antibody detection; assay development [22] | Strong immunogenicity; early expression |
| Anti-p72 Polyclonal Antibody | Rabbit or mouse host [21] | Western Blot; IHC; ELISA verification [21] | Recognizes conformational epitopes |
| Anti-p30 Monoclonal Antibody | Clone SAA2186 [21] | ELISA; rapid test development [22] | High specificity for CP204L gene product |
| qPCR Master Mix | Probe-based; internal control [19] | Nucleic acid detection standardization | High sensitivity (LOD: <10 copies/µL) |
| Magnetic Bead DNA Extraction Kit | Silica-coated beads [1] | Nucleic acid purification for POC devices | Compatible with various sample types |
| Z-Gly-betana | Z-Gly-betana | Z-Gly-betana is a synthetic peptide substrate for protease and enzyme activity research. This product is For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary diagnostic use. | Bench Chemicals |
| Dehydrodihydroionol | Dehydrodihydroionol, CAS:57069-86-0, MF:C13H22O, MW:194.31 g/mol | Chemical Reagent | Bench Chemicals |
The development and implementation of robust ASFV detection platforms require well-characterized reagents and controls. Recombinant proteins for p72, p54, and p30 serve as critical tools for both serological assay development and as positive controls for molecular tests [21]. Similarly, highly specific monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against these targets enable the creation of antigen detection assays and validation of protein expression [21]. For nucleic acid-based detection, standardized primer/probe sets targeting conserved regions of the B646L (p72), E183L (p54), and CP204L (p30) genes provide the foundation for PCR, RAA, and other amplification techniques [1]. The inclusion of appropriate positive and negative controls in every assay run is essential for verifying test performance and interpreting results accurately, particularly in point-of-care settings where environmental conditions may vary.
The integration of p72, p54, and p30 genomic targets into RAA-strip platforms represents a significant advancement in ASFV point-of-care detection. The exceptional conservation of the p72 gene (B646L) across diverse ASFV isolates makes it an ideal candidate for primary detection in molecular assays [1]. Recent research on p72's structure-function relationship has revealed that its trimeric form undergoes pH-dependent depolymerization, providing insights that could inform the development of novel detection strategies targeting conformational epitopes [20].
For enhanced diagnostic sensitivity and breadth, a multiplex RAA-strip approach simultaneously targeting p72, p54, and p30 genes offers significant advantages. This multi-target strategy mitigates the risk of false negatives due to genetic variations in any single target and provides redundant detection capability for improved reliability [1]. The early expression profiles of p54 and p30 genes enable detection during the initial stages of infection, while the highly abundant p72 transcripts (particularly in later infection stages) ensure robust signal generation in amplification-based assays [21] [22].
Table 4: Target Performance in RAA-Strip Detection Platform
| Parameter | p72 (B646L) | p54 (E183L) | p30 (CP204L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical LOD | 10-100 copies/reaction | 10-100 copies/reaction | 10-100 copies/reaction |
| Time to Result | <20 minutes | <20 minutes | <20 minutes |
| Amplification Temperature | 37-42°C | 37-42°C | 37-42°C |
| Multiplex Potential | High (primary target) | High (confirmatory target) | High (early detection target) |
| Strain Coverage | Broad (24 genotypes) | Broad with some variation | Broad with some variation |
Field validation studies of RAA-strip tests have demonstrated performance characteristics comparable to laboratory-based PCR methods, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95% when properly optimized [1]. The stability of these genomic targets across diverse ASFV strains ensures that RAA-strip tests maintain diagnostic accuracy across geographical regions and outbreak scenarios. Furthermore, the adaptability of the RAA-strip platform allows for rapid primer redesign in response to emerging viral variants, ensuring long-term utility in ASFV surveillance and control programs.
The strategic selection of p72, p54, and p30 as essential genomic targets provides a solid foundation for the development of robust, accurate, and field-deployable RAA-strip tests for African swine fever virus. Their complementary biological characteristics, conservation profiles, and expression patterns create an optimal multi-target approach for point-of-care diagnosis, enabling rapid detection and implementation of control measures during ASF outbreaks.
African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) possesses a large, double-stranded DNA genome, typically ranging from 170 to 194 kilobase pairs (kb) in length [24] [25]. The genomic architecture is organized into three distinct regions: a conserved central region (CCR) flanked by two variable regionsâthe left variable region (LVR) and the right variable region (RVR) [24] [26]. This structural organization is critical for diagnostic target selection, as the CCR houses genes that are essential for viral replication and structural integrity, resulting in higher sequence conservation across different ASFV genotypes [24] [26]. In contrast, the variable termini contain multigene families (MGFs) that exhibit significant sequence diversity and are subject to frequent insertions and deletions, making them poor targets for broad-spectrum assays [24] [27].
The B646L gene, which encodes the major capsid protein p72, is the most widely used target for ASFV genotyping and detection [24] [28] [25]. Its sequence is highly conserved due to its critical structural role, and it forms the basis for differentiating 25 ASFV genotypes [24] [24]. Other conserved genes used in detection assays include B438L (p49), another structural protein important for capsid assembly [25], and the CP204L (p30) gene [29]. The following diagram illustrates the general workflow for developing an RAA-based detection assay, from target selection to final readout.
Recombinase Aided Amplification (RAA) is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique that operates at a constant low temperature (typically 37â42 °C) and delivers results within 15â30 minutes [30] [31]. This makes it exceptionally suitable for point-of-care (POC) detection. The RAA reaction relies on three core enzymes: a recombinase that forms filaments with primers, a single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) that stabilizes the displaced DNA, and a strand-displacing DNA polymerase [30] [31].
Designing primers and probes for RAA requires adherence to specific parameters that differ from those for conventional PCR. The following guidelines are consolidated from established RAA assays [30] [31]:
The high conservation of the B646L (p72) gene makes it the primary target for most ASFV detection assays, including RAA [30] [28] [25]. For duplex assays or to enhance specificity, the B438L (p49) gene serves as an excellent secondary target [25]. When designing primers, it is crucial to perform multiple sequence alignments using sequences from the various ASFV genotypes (especially I, II, and emerging recombinants) to verify the chosen binding sites are within universally conserved stretches [24] [26] [29].
Table 1: Conserved Genomic Targets for ASFV Detection Assay Design
| Target Gene | Protein | Function | Conservation Rationale | Suitability for RAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B646L | p72 | Major capsid protein | Essential for virion structure; basis for genotyping [24] [25] | Excellent, widely used [30] [28] |
| B438L | p49 | Minor capsid protein | Critical for capsid assembly and maturation [25] | Excellent for duplex assays [25] |
| CP204L | p30 | Phosphoprotein | Involved in early viral entry and host cell interaction [29] | Good, used in historical assays |
This section provides a detailed step-by-step protocol for conducting an RAA assay combined with a lateral flow strip (LFS) for the visual detection of ASFV, targeting the conserved B646L gene.
Table 2: Essential Reagents and Equipment for RAA-LFS
| Item | Specification/Function | Example Source/Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit | For DNA extraction from tissue, blood, or serum. | MagAttract HMW DNA Kit (Qiagen) or similar [29] |
| RAA Lyophilized Kit | Contains core enzymes (recombinase, SSB, polymerase) and buffer. | nfo-RT-RAA kit (Qitian Bio-Tech) [30] |
| Forward Primer | Targets conserved region of B646L, 30-35 nt. | Designed per Section 2.1 |
| Reverse Primer | Targets conserved region of B646L, 30-35 nt, 5' modified with Biotin. | Designed per Section 2.1 [31] |
| Probe | 5' labeled with FAM, internal THF site, 3' labeled with Biotin, C3-spacer blocked. | nfo probe format for LFS [31] |
| Lateral Flow Strip | Immunochromatographic strip with anti-FAM antibodies at test line. | Commercial LFS (e.g., Milenia GenLine) |
| Incubator or Heat Block | Maintains constant temperature of 39 °C. | Accurate temperature control is critical |
| Microcentrifuge Tubes | 0.2 mL or 0.5 mL reaction tubes. | Nuclease-free |
Sample Preparation and DNA Extraction: Extract genomic DNA from clinical samples (e.g., spleen, lymph nodes, whole blood) using a commercial kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Elute the DNA in nuclease-free water or the provided elution buffer. The extracted DNA can be stored on ice or at -20 °C for long-term storage.
Reaction Master Mix Preparation: In a nuclease-free tube, prepare the master mix for each reaction as outlined below. Perform this step on ice.
Reconstitution and Initiation:
Isothermal Amplification:
Lateral Flow Strip Detection:
Result Interpretation:
The entire process, from adding the Magnesium Acetate to reading the LFS result, is summarized in the workflow below.
When validated against real-time PCR, the gold standard for ASFV detection, RAA-LFS assays demonstrate high performance. The following table compiles key performance metrics from published studies.
Table 3: Analytical and Clinical Performance of ASFV RAA and Related Isothermal Assays
| Assay Format | Target Gene | Limit of Detection (LoD) | Time-to-Result | Clinical Sensitivity | Clinical Specificity | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAA-Nucleic Acid Test Strip | B646L (p72) | 103 copies/µL plasmid | ~30 min | 94.1% (vs. PCR) | 100% | [30] |
| CRISPR/Cas13a-LFD | B646L (p72) | 101 copies/µL | <60 min | 100% (vs. qPCR) | 100% | [32] |
| Duplex Real-time RAA | B646L & B438L | 101 copies/µL (each) | ~30 min | Consistent with qPCR | 100% (No cross-reactivity) | [25] |
A critical step in assay validation is determining specificity. The designed RAA assay must be tested against a panel of common swine pathogens to rule out cross-reactivity. This panel should include, but not be limited to:
Table 4: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for RAA-based ASFV Detection Development
| Reagent / Material | Critical Function | Technical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Conserved Target Plasmids | Positive controls and assay standardization. | Recombinant plasmids containing the B646L or B438L gene fragments [25]. |
| Lyophilized RAA Reagents | Core reaction components for stable, point-of-care use. | Pre-mixed, lyophilized pellets enhance stability and reduce pipetting steps [30]. |
| Biotin & FAM-Labeled Oligos | Enable lateral flow strip detection. | 5' Biotin on reverse primer; 5' FAM and 3' Biotin with internal THF and C3-spacer on probe [31]. |
| Internal Amplification Control (IAC) | Monitors reaction inhibition; prevents false negatives. | A non-interfering synthetic sequence with unique primer-binding region [31]. |
| Portable Fluorescence Detector | Quantitative, real-time reading of RAA reactions. | Essential for real-time RAA (exo probe) format; compact devices are available [30]. |
| 2-Heptenal, (Z)- | 2-Heptenal, (Z)-, CAS:57266-86-1, MF:C7H12O, MW:112.17 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
| 1,7-Dibromo-octan-4-one | 1,7-Dibromo-octan-4-one, CAS:90673-17-9, MF:C8H14Br2O, MW:286.00 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
Within the broader research on Recombinase-Aided Amplification combined with a lateral flow strip (RAA-strip) for point-of-care detection of the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), the optimization of reaction conditions represents a critical pillar. The transition of this diagnostic technology from a laboratory technique to a reliable field tool hinges on the precise calibration of parameters such as temperature, time, and buffer composition. These factors directly govern the efficiency of the isothermal amplification and the clarity of the visual readout, ultimately determining the assay's sensitivity, specificity, and practicality for use in resource-limited settings. This application note provides a detailed protocol summarizing optimized reaction conditions and procedures for the detection of ASFV using RAA-strip technology, framed within the context of developing a robust point-of-care test.
The following table consolidates the key optimized reaction parameters for the ASFV RAA-strip assay as established in foundational studies.
Table 1: Optimized Reaction Conditions for ASFV RAA-Strip Detection
| Parameter | Optimal Condition | Context and Notes | Primary Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction Temperature | 37 - 42 °C | Constant temperature; can be achieved using a water bath or portable heat block. | [2] [30] |
| Amplification Time | 10 - 30 minutes | A 10-minute incubation was sufficient for some protocols, while others used up to 30 minutes. | [4] [2] |
| Sample Input Volume | 2 - 5 µL | Volume of treated sample or extracted nucleic acids added to the RAA reaction tube. | [30] [4] |
| Total Reaction Volume | 50 µL | Standard volume for the RAA reaction mixture. | [31] |
| Blood Sample Treatment | Dilution & Boiling | Simple dilution of blood (2-4 fold) followed by boiling for 5 minutes sufficed, eliminating complex nucleic acid extraction. | [4] |
| Lateral Flow Readout Time | 10 - 15 minutes | Time required for visual signal development on the strip after amplification. | [4] [6] |
This protocol outlines the preparation of the recombinase-aided amplification reaction.
The diagram below illustrates the complete workflow from sample preparation to result interpretation.
Step-by-Step Procedure:
The table below lists the essential reagents and materials required to establish the ASFV RAA-strip assay.
Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for RAA-Strip Development
| Item | Function / Role | Exemplar Notes |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Lyophilized Kit | Contains core enzymes (recombinase, SSB, polymerase) and basic reaction buffers for nucleic acid amplification. | Kits are available from commercial suppliers (e.g., Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology). Contains freeze-dried enzymes in pellet form for stability [30] [31]. |
| ASFV-specific Primers & Probe | Oligonucleotides designed to bind the target ASFV gene (e.g., B646L/p72) with high specificity. The probe enables lateral flow detection. | Primers: 30-35 bp. Probe: ~46-52 bp, modified with 5'-FAM and an internal THF site, with a 3'-blocking group (C3-spacer). Reverse primer is 5'-biotinylated [30] [31]. |
| Lateral Flow Strips | For visual detection of amplified products. Contains a test line (streptavidin) and control line (antibody). | The biotin- and FAM-labeled amplicon is captured at the test line, producing a visible signal [6] [4]. |
| Magnesium Acetate (280 mM) | Critical reaction starter; a cofactor essential for the enzymatic amplification process. | Added last to initiate the RAA reaction [31] [33]. |
| Portable Isothermal Heater | To provide a constant, optimal temperature for the RAA reaction outside a traditional lab. | Enables true point-of-care testing. Any device maintaining 37-42°C is suitable [4]. |
| (E)-10-Phenyl-3-decen-2-one | (E)-10-Phenyl-3-decen-2-one | (E)-10-Phenyl-3-decen-2-one is a high-purity research chemical. It is For Research Use Only (RUO). Not for human, veterinary, or household use. |
| H-Arg-Ala-NH2 . 2 HCl | H-Arg-Ala-NH2 . 2 HCl, MF:C9H22Cl2N6O2, MW:317.21 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
The optimized parameters detailed herein provide a foundational framework for the reliable detection of ASFV using RAA-strip technology. The isothermal nature of RAA, combined with its relatively low and constant temperature requirement (37-42 °C), removes the dependency on expensive thermal cyclers. Furthermore, the rapid turnaround timeâwith a total assay time from sample-to-result of under 30 minutesâand the ability to use minimally processed blood samples underscore the profound potential of this method for point-of-care diagnosis [4]. This is particularly vital for controlling the spread of ASF in field settings and remote areas where laboratory infrastructure is absent. The consistency of these optimized conditions, as demonstrated by high concordance rates with standard PCR methods, confirms that the RAA-strip assay is a mature, robust, and technically feasible solution for the frontline defense against African Swine Fever.
The accurate detection of the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) at the point of care (POC) hinges on the efficiency and appropriateness of the initial sample preparation steps. Nucleic acid testing (NAT), particularly when coupled with isothermal amplification methods like Recombinase-Aided Amplification (RAA), offers a powerful tool for rapid ASFV diagnosis [2] [34]. However, the complex structure of viral particles and the presence of inhibitors in clinical samples can severely compromise assay sensitivity and reliability. This application note details two primary sample preparation pathwaysâconventional nucleic acid extraction and direct lysis protocolsâframed within the development of an RAA-immunochromatographic strip (RAA-strip) for ASFV detection. The choice between these methods involves a critical trade-off between preparation time, required infrastructure, and analytical performance, which must be optimized for POC settings where rapid results and operational simplicity are paramount.
Conventional nucleic acid extraction remains the gold standard for preparing templates for downstream molecular assays, including RAA. This process typically involves five core steps designed to release, isolate, and purify nucleic acids from complex sample matrices [35].
The fundamental steps of nucleic acid extraction are consistent across most chemistries and include [35]:
Efficient lysis is critical for obtaining high yields of nucleic acids. The methods can be categorized as follows [35]:
Following lysis, various chemistries can be employed to purify nucleic acids from the lysate [35]:
Table 1: Comparison of Nucleic Acid Purification Chemistries
| Chemistry | Principle | Format | Advantages | Limitations for POCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica-Binding | Binding via chaotropic salts | Column, Magnetic Beads | High purity, automatable | Requires multiple steps, centrifugation/vacuum |
| Solution-Based | Alcohol precipitation | Solution in tube | Low cost, no specialized matrix | Labor-intensive, variable yield |
For POC applications, conventional extraction methods are often impractical due to their time-consuming nature and requirement for laboratory equipment. Direct lysis protocols offer a compelling alternative by simplifying sample preparation to a single-step or few-step process, bypassing purification and leveraging a lysis buffer that is compatible with downstream enzymatic amplification [36].
Direct lysis aims to disrupt the viral envelope and inactivate nucleases while maintaining the accessibility of the target nucleic acid for detection. The resulting crude lysate, containing the liberated nucleic acids, is used directly in the RAA reaction without further purification. This approach significantly reduces the sample-to-result time and eliminates the need for specialized equipment for extraction [36] [37].
The composition of the lysis buffer is critical for the success of direct amplification. Key components and their functions include [36]:
Table 2: Key Reagents for Direct Lysis and RAA-strip Detection of ASFV
| Research Reagent | Function/Application | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| BSA (1-4 mg/mL) | Direct lysis agent | Efficient lysis, nucleic acid stability, enhances RT efficiency [36] |
| RAA Basic Kit | Isothermal amplification | Contains recombinase, polymerase, and proteins for core amplification [34] [38] |
| Biotin-labeled Forward Primer | RAA-strip detection | Binds to streptavidin on test line [38] |
| FITC-labeled Reverse Primer | RAA-strip detection | Binds to anti-FITC antibody conjugated to detector [38] |
| Colloidal Gold-Nanoparticle Conjugate | RAA-strip signal generation | Labeled with anti-FITC antibody for visual detection [38] |
| Nitrocellulose Membrane | RAA-strip platform | Matrix for capillary flow and immobilization of capture lines [39] |
The performance of direct lysis versus nucleic acid extraction has been quantitatively evaluated in diagnostic assays. In the context of coronavirus detection, a meta-analysis revealed that RT-LAMP assays performed on purified RNA had a pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90â0.96), whereas assays using crude lysates had a substantially lower sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65â0.87) [37]. This highlights a universal trade-off: while direct lysis offers speed and simplicity, it can come at the cost of reduced analytical sensitivity due to the potential presence of amplification inhibitors in the crude sample.
For ASFV specifically, RAA-based assays have demonstrated high sensitivity even with simplified preparation. One study reported that an RAA-strip assay could detect recombinant plasmids containing ASFV gene fragments at levels as low as 103 copies/µL, with no cross-reactivity with other porcine viruses [2]. Another study evaluating RPA/RAA assays for ASFV reported analytical sensitivities of 93.4 and 53.6 copies per reaction, respectively, and showed excellent agreement (kappa >0.96) with OIE-recommended qPCR when testing a panel of 152 clinical samples, including various tissue types [34].
This protocol is adapted for the rapid preparation of samples for ASFV RAA-strip testing at the point of care [36].
This protocol provides a higher purity template suitable for maximizing assay sensitivity and is recommended when laboratory equipment is available [35].
The following diagrams illustrate the integration of sample preparation protocols into the complete workflow for ASFV detection via RAA-strip.
Diagram 1: Complete workflow for ASFV detection, integrating both sample preparation pathways leading to RAA amplification and lateral flow strip detection.
Diagram 2: RAA-strip detection mechanism. The dual-labeled amplicon binds the gold conjugate and is captured at the test line, generating a visual signal.
African Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly contagious and lethal infectious disease affecting domestic pigs and wild boars, causing massive economic losses to the global swine industry since its outbreak in China in 2018 [2]. The causative agent, African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), presents diagnostic challenges due to clinical symptoms similar to other porcine diseases such as Classical Swine Fever (CSF) [2]. With no effective vaccines currently available, rapid and accurate point-of-care (POC) diagnosis is essential for disease control and prevention, particularly in field settings with limited laboratory resources [4].
Recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) combined with lateral flow dipstick (LFD) detection has emerged as a powerful molecular diagnostic platform that meets the requirements for field-deployable testing. This isothermal amplification technology enables rapid detection of pathogen nucleic acids with minimal equipment, completing the entire workflow from sample to answer in under 30 minutes [4]. This Application Note details the complete protocol for ASFV detection using RAA-LFD, providing researchers with a comprehensive technical resource for implementing this rapid diagnostic platform.
Recombinase-aided amplification is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique that operates at a constant temperature range of 37-42°C. The process involves several key molecular components: recombinase enzymes derived from E. coli, single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSB), and strand-displacing DNA polymerases [40] [4].
The amplification mechanism proceeds through distinct steps as visualized in Figure 1. First, recombinase proteins form complexes with specific primers and scan double-stranded DNA for homologous sequences. Upon locating target sequences, the recombinase facilitates strand invasion and displacement, forming D-loop structures stabilized by SSB proteins. The recombinase then disassembles, allowing DNA polymerase to initiate synthesis from the 3'-OH of the primer. This process cycles continuously, enabling exponential amplification of the target sequence without thermal denaturation [4].
For detection, RAA employs a specific probe labeled with 5'-FITC and containing a THF (tetrahydrofuran) cutting site, with a 3'-end blocked by a C3 spacer. When the probe hybridizes to the target DNA, the endonuclease (Nfo) cleaves at the THF site, generating a new 3'-OH that allows the polymerase to extend and produce an amplicon tagged with both FITC and biotin labels [4].
Figure 1. Schematic of RAA reaction mechanism illustrating the six key steps in the isothermal amplification process, from recombinase-primer complex formation to dual-labeled amplicon generation.
The lateral flow detection system provides visual readout of RAA amplification products through immunochromatography. As shown in Figure 2, the biotin- and FITC-labeled RAA amplicons first bind with colloidal gold-conjugated anti-FITC antibodies in the conjugate pad. The complex migrates along the strip via capillary action until reaching the test line (T line), where streptavidin captures the biotin moiety, accumulating gold nanoparticles to form a visible red band. Excess complexes continue to the control line (C line), where anti-mouse antibodies capture the remaining gold-anti-FITC conjugates, validating proper strip function. A positive result displays red bands at both T and C lines, while a negative sample shows only the C line [4] [40].
Figure 2. Schematic of LFA visual readout showing the flow of immunocomplexes along the strip and the interpretation of positive and negative results.
Table 1: Essential Research Reagents for RAA-LFD ASFV Detection
| Item | Function/Description | Specifications |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Basic Assay Kit | Contains freeze-dried enzyme powder, rehydration buffer, and magnesium acetate solution [4] | Includes recombinase, SSB protein, DNA polymerase |
| Primer Pair | Targets ASFV B646L (p72) gene conserved region [4] | 30-35 bp length; designed for specificity |
| FITC/Biotin Probe | Detection probe with THF site | 5'-FITC modification, internal THF site, 3'-C3 spacer block [4] |
| Lateral Flow Dipsticks | Visual readout of results | Test line: streptavidin; Control line: anti-FITC antibody [40] |
| Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit | Optional DNA extraction | For purified DNA templates; not essential for direct blood processing [4] |
| Magnesium Acetate (280 mM) | Reaction initiator | Added last to start amplification [4] |
For blood samples, a simplified processing method eliminates the need for conventional nucleic acid extraction:
Note: This direct blood processing method significantly reduces inhibitory effects on RAA compared to PCR, which requires 32-64 fold dilution of blood to overcome inhibition [4].
Prepare Reaction Mix:
Initiate Amplification:
Prepare Detection:
Apply Sample:
Interpret Results:
Table 2: Sensitivity Comparison of ASFV Detection Methods
| Method | Detection Limit | Sample Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAA-LFA | 10 copies/μL | Plasmid DNA | [4] |
| RAA-LFA | 10-12 pg | Viral DNA/cDNA | [2] |
| OIE PCR | 100 copies/μL | Plasmid DNA | [4] |
| qPCR | 100 copies/μL | Extracted DNA | [4] |
The RAA-LFD assay demonstrates 10-fold higher sensitivity compared to OIE-recommended PCR and qPCR methods for ASFV detection [4]. For clinical blood samples, the method can detect ASFV with only 2-4 fold dilution, whereas PCR requires 32-64 fold dilution to overcome inhibitory components in blood [4].
The RAA-LFD assay targeting ASFV B646L gene shows no cross-reactivity with other common porcine viruses:
Similar RAA-LFD platforms developed for related pathogens including Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) and Pantoea ananatis in rice also demonstrate excellent specificity with no cross-reactivity with genetically similar organisms [40] [41].
Evaluation with clinical samples shows high concordance with reference methods:
The complete RAA-LFD workflow offers significant advantages for point-of-care testing:
For optimal assay performance:
The RAA-LFD platform represents a significant advancement in molecular point-of-care testing for African Swine Fever Virus, enabling complete detection from amplification to strip readout in under 30 minutes. This protocol provides researchers with a comprehensive guide to implement this rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic method that requires minimal equipment and technical expertise. The technology is particularly valuable for field deployment and resource-limited settings where traditional laboratory testing is impractical, offering a robust solution for early ASF detection and control.
This application note provides a detailed framework for the deployment of Recombinase-Aid Amplification combined with a lateral flow strip (RAA-LFS) for the point-of-care (POC) detection of the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV). ASF is a highly contagious viral disease with a mortality rate approaching 100% in domestic pigs, causing devastating economic losses globally [42] [1]. In the absence of effective vaccines or treatments, disease control hinges on rapid, accurate on-site diagnosis to facilitate immediate control measures [43] [44]. Traditional laboratory methods like quantitative PCR (qPCR), while sensitive and specific, require sophisticated equipment, stable power, and skilled technicians, making them unsuitable for resource-limited farm settings [45] [42] [1].
Isothermal amplification techniques, such as RAA, offer a powerful alternative. RAA enables rapid nucleic acid amplification at a constant low temperature (37â42 °C), eliminating the need for thermal cyclers [46] [31]. When integrated with a user-friendly lateral flow strip for visual readout, the RAA-LFS platform meets the critical needs for a portable, rapid, cost-effective, and accurate POC test [47] [46]. This document outlines the experimental protocols, reagent requirements, and implementation strategies for using RAA-LFS to detect ASFV in field conditions.
The following table summarizes key performance metrics of RAA-LFS alongside other common and emerging ASFV detection technologies, highlighting its suitability for field application.
Table 1: Comparison of ASFV Nucleic Acid Detection Methods
| Method | Detection Limit | Assay Time | Temperature Requirement | Key Equipment | Suitability for Field Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAA-LFS | 150 copies/reaction [47] | ~20-30 min [47] [31] | 37-42 °C (isothermal) | Portable incubator | Excellent |
| qPCR | 6.9-20 copies/reaction [42] | ~50 min - 2 hours [42] [1] | Thermal cycling (95°C, 56°C) | Thermocycler, Fluorescence detector | Poor |
| CP-LAMP | 13 copies/µL [43] | ~40 min [43] | 62 °C (isothermal) | Heater block, 3D-printed visualizer | Good |
| ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a | 10 copies/reaction [44] | ~60 min [44] | 37-42 °C (isothermal) | Portable incubator, Blue light or LFS | Good |
| Cas12a-Gold (Paper Test) | Comparable to qPCR [45] | Includes RPA step [45] | ~37 °C (isothermal) | Portable incubator (for RPA) | Excellent |
This protocol is designed for the detection of a conserved region of the ASFV genome (e.g., the p72 gene) using the RAA-LFS platform.
The entire process, from sample to result, can be completed in less than 40 minutes. The following diagram illustrates the integrated workflow of the RAA-LFS assay, from sample preparation to final result interpretation.
nfo-RAA reaction (lyophilized or liquid format). A typical 50 µL reaction contains:
nfo Probe (10 µM, 5'-end labeled with FAM, internal THF site, 3'-end blocked with C3-spacer)Successful implementation of the RAA-LFS assay relies on a set of core reagents and materials.
Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials
| Item | Function & Description | Example/Note |
|---|---|---|
Primers & nfo Probe |
Target Specificity: Binds to and amplifies a conserved ASFV gene sequence (e.g., p72, p54). The probe is cleaved during amplification to generate the detectable signal. |
Primers: 30-35 nt. Probe: ~46-52 nt, with FAM, THF, and C3-spacer [31]. |
nfo-RAA Kit |
Core Enzymes & Buffer: Contains recombinase, single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), strand-displacing polymerase, and Endonuclease IV (Nfo) in a stabilized format. | Enables isothermal amplification and probe cleavage. Lyophilized formats enhance stability for field transport [46] [31]. |
| Lateral Flow Strip | Signal Readout: For visual detection of labeled amplicons. Typically uses anti-FAM gold nanoparticles at the test line and a biotin-ligand at the control line. | e.g., Milenia HybriDetect. Stable at room temperature [46]. |
| Portable Incubator | Temperature Control: Provides a constant, low heat source for the isothermal RAA reaction. | Small, battery-powered devices maintaining 37-42 °C are ideal. |
| Rapid Lysis Buffer | Sample Prep: Chemically disrupts viral particles to release nucleic acids, bypassing the need for column-based purification. | Enables quick sample preparation in under 20 minutes [1]. |
| Glycerol,[1,3-14c] | Glycerol,[1,3-14C]|Radioisotope Labeled Reagent | Glycerol,[1,3-14C] is a carbon-14 labeled tracer for metabolic research. This product is for Research Use Only (RUO). Not for human or veterinary use. |
| 4-Methyl-2,6-naphthyridine | 4-Methyl-2,6-naphthyridine, MF:C9H8N2, MW:144.17 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
Deploying the RAA-LFS assay in resource-limited settings requires careful planning to ensure reliability and effectiveness.
nfo probe significantly enhances specificity compared to basic RPA [46].In the development of a Recombinase-Aided Amplification combined with a lateral flow strip (RAA-strip) for the point-of-care detection of the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), achieving high specificity is paramount to diagnostic accuracy. False positive results undermine test reliability, potentially leading to unnecessary containment measures and significant economic losses in the swine industry. The primer-probe system is the foundation of assay specificity, dictating the binding efficiency and selectivity of the amplification reaction. This application note details a comprehensive suite of in silico and in vitro strategies for the rigorous screening of primer-probe sets and the enhancement of specificity, with a dedicated focus on ASFV RAA-strip diagnostics. By implementing these protocols, researchers can significantly mitigate the risk of false positives, thereby bolstering the reliability of point-of-care testing outcomes.
A robust in silico workflow is the first and most critical defense against false positives. This process ensures primer-probe sets are designed for optimal specificity and stability before costly wet-lab experiments begin.
The design phase must account for the genetic evolution of the target pathogen. For ASFV, this involves targeting highly conserved regions within the genome, such as the p72 gene (B646L), which demonstrates better stability than other structural proteins [2] [30]. The following principles are essential:
Once candidate sequences are designed, their specificity must be predicted computationally.
The following diagram illustrates the core logical workflow for the computational screening process.
Table 1: Key In silico Tools for Primer-Probe Screening
| Tool Name | Function | Key Parameter for Specificity |
|---|---|---|
| BLAST [49] | Identifies sequence homologs in public databases | E-value, percentage identity, query coverage |
| TaqSim [49] | Predicts amplification of public sequences by a specific primer-probe set | Number of mismatches, primer-probe vs. candidate hit Tm |
| MUSCLE [48] | Multiple sequence alignment to identify conserved regions | Alignment consensus, variable sites |
| PrimerExpress [49] | Commercial software for primer-probe design; checks for secondary structures | Hairpins, self-dimers, cross-dimers |
After in silico screening, candidate primer-probe sets must undergo rigorous laboratory testing to confirm specificity and identify any non-target amplification.
A definitive test for false positives involves challenging the RAA-strip assay with a panel of non-target pathogens.
Research has demonstrated that well-designed RAA assays for ASFV show no cross-reaction with other porcine viruses, confirming high specificity [2].
Establishing the limit of detection (LoD) helps define the assay's working range and ensures that specificity is maintained even near the detection limit.
Table 2: Essential Reagents and Materials for RAA-Strip Development and Specificity Testing
| Item | Function & Application | Example/Specification |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Core Reagents | Enzymes (recombinase, polymerase, SSB), buffers, and cofactors for isothermal nucleic acid amplification. | RAA basic kit (e.g., from Qitian) [34]. |
| Lateral Flow Strips | Visual detection of labeled amplification products. Typically have a control line and one or more test lines. | HybriDetect strips or similar, capable of detecting FAM/Biotin-labeled products [50]. |
| Labeled Primers/Probes | Oligonucleotides for specific amplification and detection. Probes are often FAM-labeled, and primers may be biotinylated. | Probes ~46-52 bp; Primers ~30-35 bp [30]. |
| Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit | Purifies target DNA/RNA from clinical samples (e.g., blood, spleen) for template input. | Magnetic bead-based kits or column-based kits [51]. |
| Cross-Reactivity Panel | Genomic material from non-target pathogens to experimentally validate assay specificity. | CSFV, FMDV, PRRSV, PCV2, PRV [34]. |
| Positive Control Template | A well-characterized sample containing the target sequence to validate each assay run. | Plasmid with cloned ASFV p72 gene fragment or quantified ASFV genomic DNA [2]. |
| Sulfo saed | Sulfo saed, MF:C21H21N5O9S3, MW:583.6 g/mol | Chemical Reagent |
This protocol outlines the core steps for performing the recombinase-aided amplification and visualizing the results via a lateral flow strip for ASFV detection [2] [30].
Result Interpretation:
The workflow below integrates the RAA reaction with the lateral flow detection step.
This protocol provides a detailed method for experimentally confirming the specificity of the ASFV RAA-strip assay.
Table 3: Analytical Performance of Representative RAA/RPA Assays for ASFV
| Target Pathogen | Assay Type | Detection Limit | Specificity (Cross-Reactivity) | Clinical Sensitivity vs. PCR | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASFV | RAA-Strip | 10³ copies/µL (plasmid); 10-12 pg (viral DNA) | No cross-reaction with CSFV, PCV2, etc. | 94.1% (ASFV) | [2] |
| ASFV | RPA/RAA (real-time) | 53.6-93.4 copies/reaction | Specific for all 24 ASFV genotypes; no cross-reaction with CSFV, FMDV, etc. | 96.6%-97.7% | [34] |
| Cyprinid Herpesvirus 3 | PCR-LFA | 9 gene copies/µL (95% probability) | Diagnostic Specificity: 100% | Diagnostic Sensitivity: 94.81% | [50] |
Within point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), Recombinase-Aided Amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick (RAA-strip) represents a transformative technology. It enables rapid, instrument-free nucleic acid detection critical for field deployment. A primary challenge in its application, however, is the occurrence of false-negative results, which can undermine disease control efforts. This Application Note addresses the root causes of false negatives in ASFV RAA-strip assays and provides detailed, evidence-based protocols for the systematic optimization of reaction components to enhance sensitivity and ensure reliable detection.
The RAA-strip assay is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique that operates at 37â42°C, typically completing within 20â30 minutes [52] [34]. Its core principle involves a recombinase enzyme that pairs with primers to form filaments, scanning double-stranded DNA for homologous sequences and facilitating strand invasion. Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) stabilize the displaced strand, and DNA polymerase synthesizes a new DNA strand [52]. When a probe labeled with 6-carboxy-fluorescein (FAM) and biotin is incorporated, the amplification product can be detected on a lateral flow strip. The FAM moiety binds to anti-FAM antibodies conjugated to gold nanoparticles or latex beads, and this complex is captured at the test line by streptavidin, which binds the biotin tag, producing a visible band [40] [39].
Figure 1 illustrates the workflow and core components of a typical RAA-strip assay for ASFV detection.
Figure 1: RAA-Strip Workflow and Core Components for ASFV Detection.
Potential sources of false negatives in this process include:
The design of primers and probes is the foundational element determining assay specificity and sensitivity. Optimal design parameters are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Key Parameters for Primer and Probe Design Optimization
| Component | Optimal Length | Key Sequence Features | Labeling | Functional Role |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward/Reverse Primers | 30â35 bp [52] | High specificity to ASFV p72 gene [2]; Avoid self-complementarity & secondary structures | Unmodified | Initiate strand invasion & amplification |
| Probe | 46â52 bp [52] | Internal abasic site (e.g., dSpacer, THF) for exonuclease cleavage [34] | 5'-FAM, 3'-Biotin [40] [52] | Generates detectable signal on LFD |
Experimental Protocol: Primer and Probe Screening
Integrating an Internal Control (IC) is critical to distinguish true negative results from amplification failures, thereby eliminating a major source of false negatives [53] [54]. A competitive IC uses the same primer binding sites as the ASFV target but has a different internal sequence, allowing it to be amplified and detected differentially.
Experimental Protocol: Integration of a Competitive IC
Figure 2 illustrates the mechanism and result interpretation for an RAA-strip assay incorporating a competitive internal control.
Figure 2: Mechanism and Interpretation of a Competitive Internal Control in RAA-Strip.
For samples with extremely low viral load, combining RAA with a pre-amplification step or a more sensitive readout system can drastically improve detection.
A. CRISPR/Cas12a-Mediated Signal Amplification CRISPR/Cas12a technology can be integrated post-RAA to provide secondary signal amplification and enhance specificity [55]. Upon recognizing its target sequence (the RAA amplicon), the Cas12a enzyme exhibits collateral activity, cleaving nearby single-stranded DNA reporters. This cleavage can be configured for a highly visible lateral flow readout.
Experimental Protocol: RAA coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a-LFD
B. Latex Microsphere-Based Signal Enhancement Replacing traditional colloidal gold with blue (or other colored) latex microspheres can improve signal visibility and intensity due to their uniform size and high dye-loading capacity [39].
Table 2: Essential Reagents and Materials for ASFV RAA-Strip Development
| Item | Specification/Recommended Source | Critical Function in Assay |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Basic Kit | Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co. [40] [52] | Core freeze-dried enzyme pellets (recombinase, SSB, polymerase) and reaction buffer. |
| ASFV Primers/Probe | HPLC-purified; targeting p72 (B646L) gene [2] [34] | Ensures specific amplification and detection of ASFV. |
| Lateral Flow Strip | Nitrocellulose membrane with Test Line (Streptavidin) and Control Line (anti-FAM) [40] [52] | Visual capture and display of amplification products. |
| Competitive IC Plasmid | Synthetic DNA with primer binding sites and altered probe sequence [53] | Distinguishes true negatives from amplification failures. |
| CRISPR/Cas12a System | Recombinant LbCas12a protein and target-specific crRNA [55] | Provides secondary signal amplification for ultra-sensitive detection. |
| Latex Microspheres | Blue carboxylated latex beads (e.g., 0.2 µm) [39] | Anti-FAM antibody conjugate for high-visibility signal generation. |
The optimization strategies outlined above lead to measurable improvements in key performance metrics, particularly sensitivity. Table 3 compares the detection limits of various ASFV detection configurations.
Table 3: Sensitivity Comparison of Different ASFV Detection Methods
| Detection Method | Target Gene | Limit of Detection (Copies/Reaction) | Key Features | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic RAA-Strip | ASFV p72 | 1 à 103 copies/µL (plasmid) [2] | Rapid, instrument-free, suitable for field use. | [2] |
| Real-Time RAA | ASFV p72 | 53.6 (95% probability) [34] | Quantitative, closed-tube system reduces contamination. | [34] |
| RAA + CRISPR/Cas12a-LFD | ASFV p72 | 20 [55] | Extremely high sensitivity and specificity; two-step process. | [55] |
| Conventional qPCR | ASFV p72 | Varies by kit (typically < 10) | Gold standard; requires thermocycler and trained personnel. | [34] |
The optimization of reaction components is paramount to maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of ASFV RAA-strip tests. By methodically addressing primer and probe design, incorporating competitive internal controls to flag false negatives, and leveraging advanced signal amplification technologies like CRISPR/Cas12a, researchers can significantly enhance the performance of these point-of-care diagnostics. The protocols and data presented herein provide a concrete roadmap for developing robust RAA-strip assays capable of dependable, early detection of African Swine Fever Virus, thereby contributing to more effective disease surveillance and control.
The Recombinase-Aided Amplification (RAA) test strip assay represents a significant advancement in point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), offering rapid and visual detection [2]. However, the accurate identification of ASFV in complex field samples presents substantial technical challenges, primarily due to the presence of amplification inhibitors and diagnostically significant low viral loads [1]. These factors can severely compromise assay sensitivity and specificity, leading to false-negative results that undermine disease control efforts.
This application note provides detailed protocols and strategic approaches to optimize RAA-strip performance when analyzing challenging samples. We address the complete workflow from sample preparation to result interpretation, incorporating robust controls and procedural modifications to enhance detection reliability for ASFV monitoring in resource-limited settings.
Complex samples from swineâincluding blood, tissue homogenates, and oral fluidsâcontain numerous substances that can interfere with nucleic acid amplification. These inhibitors include heme compounds from blood, immunoglobulins, lipids, and cellular debris [1]. When coupled with naturally low viral loads, particularly during the early incubation period or in subclinical infections, these inhibitors can reduce assay sensitivity by orders of magnitude.
Table 1: Challenges in ASFV Detection Across Infection Stages
| Infection Stage | Viral Load Dynamics | Primary Detection Challenges | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early Infection (Asymptomatic) | Low viral load in blood and tissues [1] | High risk of false negatives; inhibitors present in sample matrices | Sample concentration; internal controls; high-sensitivity RAA |
| Acute Phase | High viral load across tissues [1] | Sample viscosity; high concentration of inhibitors | Sample dilution; optimized extraction; inhibitor-resistant enzymes |
| Chronic/Persistent Infection | Variable, often low-level viremia [1] | Intermittent shedding; antibody competition | Repeated testing; combined antigen/antibody detection |
| Convalescent Phase | Declining viral load [1] | Differentiating active infection from clearance; inhibitor persistence | Quantitative methods; follow-up testing |
Effective sample preparation is critical for removing inhibitors while maximizing target nucleic acid recovery. The choice between purified DNA and direct lysates involves important trade-offs:
DNA Extraction Methods:
Table 2: Sample Preparation Methods for ASFV Detection
| Method | Procedure | Advantages | Limitations | Inhibitor Removal Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica-Based Column Extraction | Standardized binding-wash-elute steps [1] | High purity nucleic acids; compatible with various samples | Specialized equipment; longer processing time | High |
| Magnetic Bead Extraction | Magnetic separation with wash steps [1] | Amenable to automation; consistent yields | Higher cost; requires magnetic separation | High |
| Simple Lysis (QIAGEN ATL Buffer) | Lysis buffer incubation at 70°C for 20 min [1] | Rapid (<30 min); minimal equipment; no DNA loss | Potential residual inhibitors; reduced sensitivity | Moderate |
| Boiling Extraction | Heating at 95°C for 5-10 minutes | Extremely simple; low cost | High inhibitor carryover; variable yields | Low |
Enhancing the robustness of RAA reactions against residual inhibitors can be achieved through specific reagent modifications:
The standard RAA-strip assay demonstrates a detection limit of approximately 10³ copies/μL for ASFV recombinant plasmids [2]. For improved low viral load detection:
For challenging applications requiring ultra-sensitive detection, consider these advanced approaches:
Materials:
Procedure:
RAA Reaction Assembly:
Amplification and Detection:
Troubleshooting:
For samples with known inhibition issues (e.g., hemolyzed blood, tissue samples):
Modified Extraction:
Enhanced Reaction Mix:
Controls:
Table 3: Essential Reagents for RAA-Strip ASFV Detection
| Reagent/Category | Specific Examples | Function | Optimization Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinase Enzymes | uvsX (T4 phage) [34], E. coli recombinase [34] | Binds primers to facilitate strand invasion | E. coli recombinase may offer better stability in field conditions |
| Primer/Probe Sets | B646L (p72) target [1] [34] | Specific ASFV detection | Conserved region across 24 genotypes; minimal cross-reactivity |
| Amplification Cocktail | Basic RAA reaction buffer [2] | Provides nucleotides, cofactors, stabilizers | Supplement with BSA for inhibitor resistance |
| Detection Components | Lateral flow strips with anti-FAM gold conjugate [2] | Visual result readout | Test strip lot validation required for consistency |
| Sample Processing | Lysis buffers (e.g., QIAGEN ATL) [1], silica membranes [1] | Nucleic acid release and purification | Lysis buffer type affects inhibitor carryover and sensitivity |
| Inhibition Controls | Internal Amplification Control (IPC) [1] | Detection of reaction inhibition | Should be added prior to nucleic acid extraction |
Successfully managing inhibitors and low viral loads in ASFV RAA-strip detection requires a comprehensive strategy addressing the entire workflow from sample collection to result interpretation. The protocols and recommendations presented here enable researchers to achieve reliable detection across the spectrum of infection stages and sample types. Implementation of appropriate sample preparation methods, reaction enhancements, and robust controls ensures that the field-deployable advantages of RAA-strip technology are realized without compromising diagnostic accuracy. Continued refinement of these approaches will further enhance ASF surveillance and control programs worldwide.
The development of a robust recombinase aided amplification lateral flow strip (RAA-strip) assay for the point-of-care (POC) detection of African swine fever virus (ASFV) necessitates a thorough understanding of lyophilized reagent stability. Lyophilization, or freeze-drying, has emerged as a critical preservation method that enhances reagent shelf life and facilitates transport without cold chain dependencies [56]. For ASFV POC detection in resource-limited settings such as farms and field laboratories, ensuring the long-term stability of lyophilized RAA reagents becomes paramount to maintaining diagnostic accuracy, assay reliability, and operational feasibility. This application note examines the factors affecting lyophilized reagent stability and provides evidence-based protocols for optimizing storage conditions within the context of ASFV molecular detection research.
Lyophilization preserves biological reagents by removing water through sublimation under vacuum after freezing, resulting in a dry, porous cake that significantly enhances stability by reducing molecular mobility and inhibiting degradation pathways [56]. The process transforms liquid reagents into a solid state where chemical reactions and biological activity are substantially slowed, thereby extending shelf life and reducing dependency on cold chain infrastructure.
The structural integrity and functionality of lyophilized reagents depend heavily on the presence of lyoprotective excipients that stabilize biomolecules during both the freezing and drying phases. These protectants form an amorphous glassy matrix that protects sensitive enzymes and nucleic acids from denaturation and maintains their conformational stability during storage [57]. For RAA-based ASFV detection, which relies on the activity of multiple enzymes including recombinase, polymerase, and reverse transcriptase, proper formulation is essential to preserve enzymatic activity and ensure consistent assay performance after reconstitution.
The selection of appropriate stabilizers and excipients in the lyophilization formulation critically determines the long-term stability of diagnostic reagents. Extensive research has identified several effective lyoprotectants:
Sugar-Based Stabilizers: Trehalose has demonstrated exceptional stabilization properties at concentrations of 75 mM in colorimetric RT-LAMP reactions, maintaining enzymatic activity for up to 28 days at room temperature [57]. Its effectiveness stems from the formation of a stable glassy matrix and direct interaction with biomolecules via water substitution mechanisms.
Polymeric Enhancers: Polyethylene glycol (PEG), particularly at 5% concentration for PEG 8000, synergistically improves stability when combined with trehalose by enhancing the structural integrity of the lyophilized cake and providing additional protection during storage [57].
Amino Acid Additives: Arginine at 10 mM concentration contributes to protein stability by suppressing aggregation and preventing unwanted protein-protein interactions during lyophilization and storage [57].
Storage temperature represents one of the most critical variables affecting the stability of lyophilized reagents. Comparative studies on lyophilized mesenchymal stromal cell secretome (MSC-sec) have revealed dramatic differences in biomolecule preservation across temperature conditions:
Table 1: Effect of Storage Temperature on Lyophilized Reagent Stability
| Storage Temperature | Storage Duration | Preservation of Key Components | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| -80°C | 30 months | >70% of all growth factors and cytokines maintained | Optimal for long-term preservation |
| -20°C | 30 months | Significant decrease in BDNF, bNGF, and VEGF-A | Moderate degradation occurred |
| 4°C | 30 months | Drastic reduction in BDNF, bNGF, VEGF-A, IL-6, and sVCAM-1 | Substantial degradation |
| Room Temperature | 30 months | Drastic reduction in BDNF, bNGF, VEGF-A, IL-6, and sVCAM-1 | Substantial degradation; unsuitable for long-term storage |
| Room Temperature | 3 months | >60% of most components maintained; decrease in BDNF, bNGF, sVCAM-1 | Acceptable for short-term storage |
Data adapted from Scientific Reports (2024) [58]
These findings demonstrate that while ultra-low temperature storage (-80°C) provides optimal preservation across extended periods, even short-term storage at elevated temperatures can initiate degradation of sensitive components, particularly neurotrophic factors and certain cytokines [58].
The duration of storage directly correlates with cumulative degradation effects, particularly when suboptimal temperatures are employed. Research indicates that short-term stability (up to 3 months) can be maintained at various temperatures with acceptable preservation of most components, but long-term stability (30 months) requires ultra-low temperature storage to prevent significant degradation [58]. This temporal relationship underscores the importance of defining expiration dates based on validated stability studies under specific storage conditions.
This protocol outlines the procedure for lyophilizing RAA reagents for ASFV detection, adapted from established methodologies for nucleic acid amplification tests [57].
Materials:
Procedure:
Aliquoting:
Freezing Phase:
Primary Drying:
Secondary Drying:
Sealing and Storage:
Regular stability testing is essential to establish shelf life and validate storage conditions for lyophilized RAA reagents.
Accelerated Stability Studies:
Real-Time Stability Studies:
Assessment Parameters:
The development of a lyophilized RAA-strip assay for ASFV detection requires special attention to the stability of multiple biological components:
Enzyme Stability: The RAA reaction depends on recombinase enzymes (derived from E. coli) [40], DNA polymerase, and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins. These enzymes are particularly sensitive to conformational changes during lyophilization and storage. Proper lyoprotectant formulation is essential to maintain their activity.
Nucleic Acid Stability: Primers and probes targeting conserved regions of the ASFV genome (such as the p72 gene) must retain their structural integrity and hybridization capacity. While generally more stable than proteins, nucleic acids can still degrade through hydrolysis or oxidation if improperly stored.
Lateral Flow Component Stability: The antibodies immobilized on the lateral flow strip for detection (typically anti-FAM and streptavidin) require protection from humidity and temperature fluctuations [40]. While often stored separately from lyophilized reagents, their stability directly impacts overall assay performance.
Based on stability data from comparable systems:
Table 2: Recommended Storage Conditions for Lyophilized ASFV RAA-Strip Components
| Component | Recommended Storage Temperature | Expected Shelf Life | Key Stability Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyophilized RAA Enzyme Pellet | -20°C or below | >18 months [59] | Maintain enzymatic activity; protect from moisture |
| Lyophilized Primer/Probe Mix | -20°C | >24 months | Prevent hydrolysis and degradation |
| Prepared Lateral Flow Strips | 4-8°C (desiccated) | 12-18 months | Preserve antibody functionality; protect from humidity |
| Fully Lyophilized Master Mix (enzymes + primers) | -20°C for long-term; 4°C for short-term | >18 months at -20°C; 1 month at 4°C | Comprehensive protection of all components |
The following diagram illustrates the complete workflow for employing lyophilized reagents in ASFV detection, from preparation through result interpretation:
Successful implementation of lyophilized reagent systems requires specific specialized products designed to enhance stability and performance:
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Lyophilization Optimization
| Reagent | Composition/Type | Function in Lyophilization | Application in ASFV RAA-Strip Development |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microbial Freeze Drying Buffer [59] [60] | Proprietary, animal component-free formulation | Preserves viability of biological components | Potential stabilization of enzyme mixes |
| Lyophilization Reagent (2X) Concentrate [59] [60] | Matrix former and lyoprotectant mixture | Provides cryoprotection and stabilizes proteins | Protection of RAA enzymes during freeze-drying |
| Freeze Drying Indicator [59] [60] | Colorimetric indicator solution | Monitors process completeness by color change | Validation of lyophilization cycle effectiveness |
| Trehalose [57] | Disaccharide sugar | Forms stable glassy matrix, water substitution | Primary lyoprotectant at 75 mM concentration |
| PEG 8000 [57] | Polyethylene glycol polymer | Enhances cake structure, synergistic stabilization | Used at 5% concentration with trehalose |
The stability of lyophilized reagents represents a cornerstone in the development of robust, field-deployable RAA-strip assays for African swine fever virus detection. Through careful formulation optimization with appropriate lyoprotectants like trehalose and PEG, combined with stringent temperature-controlled storage conditions, researchers can ensure the long-term stability and reliability of these critical diagnostic components. Implementation of the protocols and considerations outlined in this application note will support the advancement of POC diagnostic tools for ASFV, ultimately contributing to more effective disease management and control strategies in swine populations.
The need for rapid, sensitive, and specific point-of-care (POC) diagnostics is paramount in controlling rapidly spreading viral diseases such as African Swine Fever (ASF). African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), a large double-stranded DNA virus, causes a highly contagious and often fatal disease in domestic pigs and wild boars, generating substantial economic losses in the global swine industry [13] [32]. The absence of effective vaccines or treatments means disease control relies heavily on strict biosecurity and the rapid identification of infected animals [13] [61]. Conventional diagnostic methods like quantitative PCR (qPCR), while sensitive and specific, require sophisticated thermal cycling equipment and trained personnel, limiting their use in field settings [13] [52].
Recombinase-Aided Amplification (RAA) presents a powerful isothermal amplification technique that operates at a constant low temperature (37â42°C), rapidly amplifying target nucleic acids without the need for complex instrumentation [52] [40]. When coupled with the precise target recognition of CRISPR/Cas systems, the resulting RAA-CRISPR platform achieves unparalleled specificity and sensitivity suitable for POC testing. This combination is particularly powerful because RAA ensures high sensitivity through rapid nucleic acid amplification, while the CRISPR/Cas system provides exceptional specificity through RNA-guided recognition and collateral cleavage activity, enabling visual detection on lateral flow strips [13] [62] [63]. This article details the application notes and protocols for configuring this advanced diagnostic system specifically for ASFV detection, providing researchers and drug development professionals with a framework for developing robust field-deployable assays.
The RAA-CRISPR platform synergizes two powerful biological technologies. RAA is an isothermal amplification method that uses a recombinase to facilitate primer binding to the target DNA sequence, followed by strand displacement DNA synthesis. This process efficiently amplifies target sequences within 20-30 minutes at a constant temperature of 37-42°C [52] [40]. The CRISPR/Cas13a system, derived from bacterial adaptive immunity, employs a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) to guide the Cas13a enzyme to specific RNA sequences. Upon target recognition, Cas13a exhibits collateral cleavage activity, non-specifically degrading nearby RNA molecules, including reporter RNAs labeled with fluorescent tags or haptens [13] [62] [63].
For ASFV detection, the DNA genome is first amplified by RAA using primers that incorporate a T7 promoter sequence. The amplified DNA is then transcribed into RNA, which serves as the target for the Cas13a/crRNA complex. When the crRNA binds to its complementary RNA target, it activates Cas13a's collateral cleavage activity, which degrades a reporter molecule to generate a detectable signal [13]. This signal can be quantified fluorometrically or visualized on a lateral flow strip (LFS), making the platform highly adaptable for various field settings.
The successful implementation of an RAA-CRISPR assay requires carefully selected reagents and components, each playing a critical role in the detection cascade. The table below summarizes the key research reagent solutions needed for configuring the ASFV detection system.
Table 1: Essential Research Reagents for RAA-CRISPR ASFV Detection
| Component | Function | Specifications/Examples |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Enzymes & Buffers | Catalyzes isothermal amplification of target DNA | Freeze-dried enzyme pellets including recombinase, single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), and DNA polymerase [64] [52] |
| CRISPR/Cas13a Protein | RNA-guided ribonuclease providing detection specificity | LwCas13a protein; collateral cleavage activated upon target RNA binding [13] [62] |
| crRNA | Guides Cas13a to complementary target RNA sequence | Designed against conserved region of ASFV p72 gene; ~28 nt target-specific sequence [13] |
| Primers | Amplifies target ASFV sequence during RAA | Targets conserved region of ASFV p72 gene (B646L); forward primer includes T7 promoter sequence for subsequent transcription [13] |
| Reporter Molecule | Generates detectable signal upon Cas13a cleavage | RNA reporter with 5'-FAM and 3'-Biotin for lateral flow detection [62] [65] |
| Lateral Flow Strip (LFS) | Provides visual readout of detection result | Nitrocellulose strip with test (streptavidin) and control (anti-FAM antibody) lines [13] [40] |
| NTP Mix | Provides energy for transcription and collateral cleavage | Includes ATP, UTP, GTP, CTP for in vitro transcription [62] |
The development of a robust RAA-CRISPR assay for ASFV requires meticulous planning in several key areas. First, target selection is critical; the highly conserved p72 gene (B646L) of ASFV is the most frequently targeted region due to its stability and consistent expression across different viral genotypes [13] [52] [32]. This strategic choice ensures the assay can detect a broad range of ASFV strains. For primer design, specific sequences within the p72 gene conserved region must be selected, with the forward primer incorporating the T7 promoter sequence (5'-GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3') at its 5' end to enable subsequent in vitro transcription [13] [62]. The crRNA should be designed to bind to a conserved region within the RAA amplicon, typically 28 nucleotides in length, and must be screened for optimal performance and minimal off-target effects [13] [62].
The procedural workflow integrates these components into a seamless diagnostic pipeline, as visualized in the following diagram:
Diagram 1: RAA-CRISPR-LFS workflow for ASFV detection
I. Sample Preparation and RAA Amplification
II. CRISPR/Cas13a Detection and Visualization
The performance of the RAA-CRISPR-LFS platform for ASFV detection has been rigorously evaluated against standard reference methods, with key metrics summarized in the table below.
Table 2: Performance Metrics of RAA-CRISPR ASFV Detection
| Parameter | Performance Value | Experimental Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Detection Limit | 10¹ copies/μL (p72 gene) | Using serial dilutions of pUC57-p72 standard plasmid [13] [32] |
| Assay Time | < 60 minutes | RAA (20-30 min) + CRISPR (20 min) + LFS (5 min) [13] |
| Reaction Temperature | 37°C (isothermal) | Uniform temperature for RAA and CRISPR steps [13] [62] |
| Specificity | 100% (no cross-reactivity) | No cross-reactivity with 8 other swine viruses (CSFV, PRV, etc.) [13] [32] |
| Clinical Concordance | 100% (83/83 samples) | Compared with real-time PCR on clinical samples [13] [32] |
| Reproducibility | High consistency | Minimal batch-to-batch variation with freeze-dried reagents [62] [64] |
The exceptional sensitivity of the assay, detecting as few as 10 viral copies per microliter, enables identification of early infections when viral loads are low [13]. The 100% specificity confirms the method's reliability in distinguishing ASFV from other common swine pathogens that might cause similar clinical presentations, such as Classical Swine Fever Virus (CSFV) [13] [32]. The complete concordance with real-time PCR results from clinical validation using 83 field samples demonstrates the assay's robustness and diagnostic accuracy [13].
Several factors require careful optimization to maximize assay performance. Primer and crRNA design should focus on highly conserved regions of the ASFV genome, with multiple candidate sequences empirically tested to identify the most efficient combinations [13] [62]. The RAA reaction temperature may require fine-tuning between 37-42°C depending on the specific primer sequences and the recombinant enzyme batch used [52] [40]. The ratio of Cas13a to crRNA in the detection step significantly impacts the collateral cleavage efficiency and should be optimized through checkerboard titration [13] [65]. Additionally, the lateral flow strip development can be enhanced by ensuring proper conjugation of gold nanoparticles with anti-FAM antibodies and optimal dispensing of capture reagents on the nitrocellulose membrane [40].
The following diagram illustrates the molecular detection mechanism that underlies the assay's performance:
Diagram 2: Molecular mechanism of RAA-CRISPR detection
The RAA-CRISPR-LFS platform demonstrates particular utility in several practical applications for ASF control. Its rapid turnaround time (under 60 minutes) enables same-day decision making for quarantine measures, containment protocols, and movement controls in outbreak situations [13] [32]. The minimal equipment requirements (simple heating block and lateral flow strips) make it suitable for field deployment in resource-limited settings where conventional PCR instruments are unavailable [13] [52]. The high sensitivity and specificity allow for accurate screening of pigs at various points â including farms, slaughterhouses, and border checkpoints â helping to prevent silent spread through subclinically infected animals [13]. Furthermore, the visual readout eliminates the need for sophisticated signal detection equipment and facilitates interpretation by personnel with minimal technical training [13] [40].
Successful implementation requires attention to potential technical challenges. To prevent false negatives, ensure proper storage of freeze-dried RAA reagents and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of Cas13a protein and crRNA [64]. Nuclease-free techniques are essential throughout the procedure, particularly during the CRISPR reaction, to prevent degradation of RNA components [13]. For weak or ambiguous lateral flow signals, optimize the dilution factor of the CRISPR reaction product before application to the strip and ensure the strip is stored in a sealed desiccant pouch until use [64] [40]. If non-specific amplification occurs, redesign primers and crRNA to ensure target specificity and include appropriate negative controls in each run [13] [62]. Batch-to-batch quality control of critical reagents â particularly the Cas13a protein and crRNA â is essential for maintaining consistent assay performance [13].
The integration of RAA with CRISPR/Cas systems represents a significant advancement in molecular diagnostics for African Swine Fever Virus. This configuration combines the rapid, isothermal amplification capability of RAA with the exceptional specificity of CRISPR/Cas13a recognition, creating a platform that is both highly accurate and field-deployable. The provided application notes and detailed protocols offer researchers and diagnosticians a framework for implementing this technology in diverse settings. With a detection sensitivity of 10¹ copies/μL, 100% specificity, and results within 60 minutes, the RAA-CRISPR-LFS system meets the critical need for rapid, reliable ASFV detection at the point of care. This technology not only supports ongoing ASF control efforts but also provides a adaptable blueprint for developing diagnostic platforms for other economically significant animal and human diseases.
In the development of point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests for African swine fever virus (ASFV), the precise determination of the Limit of Detection (LOD) in copies/μL is a critical validation parameter that defines the lowest viral concentration reliably detectable by the assay [66]. For recombinant enzyme amplification (RAA)-based lateral flow strip tests, establishing a robust LOD is particularly important for ensuring early detection of ASFV during the acute phase of infection when viral loads are initially low [1]. The LOD represents the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be reliably distinguished from analytical noise with a defined confidence level, typically 95% [66]. In practical terms for ASFV detection, this translates to the minimum number of viral DNA copies per microliter that an RAA-strip assay can identify with high certainty, enabling field applications where laboratory infrastructure is unavailable [32] [44]. This protocol details the experimental and statistical approaches for determining and validating LOD for ASFV RAA-strip assays, providing researchers with standardized methodologies essential for assay validation and regulatory approval.
The Limit of Detection (LOD) is fundamentally defined as the lowest analyte concentration that can be reliably distinguished from the blank or background signal [66]. In clinical and analytical chemistry, this is formally expressed through statistical parameters derived from blank and low-concentration sample measurements:
Limit of Blank (LoB): The highest apparent analyte concentration expected when replicates of a blank sample are tested, calculated as: LoB = meanblank + 1.645(SDblank) This establishes the threshold where 95% of blank measurements fall below this value, with 5% representing false positives (Type I error) [66].
Limit of Detection (LOD): The lowest analyte concentration likely to be reliably distinguished from LoB, determined by: LOD = LoB + 1.645(SD_low concentration sample) This ensures that 95% of measurements at the LOD concentration will exceed the LoB, minimizing false negatives (Type II error) [66].
For nucleic acid detection methods like RAA-strip tests targeting ASFV, these statistical principles are adapted to define LOD as the minimum number of DNA copies per microliter that can be detected with 95% confidence [1] [32].
The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guideline Q2(R1) describes three primary approaches for LOD determination [67]:
The third method is particularly valuable for RAA-strip assays as it incorporates both the precision of measurement (through Ï) and the method sensitivity (through S), providing a more statistically robust LOD estimate [69] [67].
Table 1: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for ASFV RAA-Strip LOD Determination
| Reagent/Material | Function | Example Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Synthetic ASFV target genes (p72, E183L, K205R) | Positive controls for sensitivity determination | [32] [44] |
| RAA/nucleic acid amplification kit | Isothermal amplification of target sequences | [32] [44] |
| Cas12a enzyme and crRNA reagents | CRISPR-based detection system component | [32] [44] |
| Lateral flow strips | Visual detection of amplified products | [32] |
| Fluorophore-quencher labeled ssDNA probes | Reporter molecules for cleavage detection | [44] |
| Viral DNA extraction kit | Nucleic acid purification from samples | [1] |
Table 2: ASFV Target Genes for LOD Determination in RAA-Strip Assays
| Target Gene | Function/Characteristics | Conservation | Suitability for RAA-Strip |
|---|---|---|---|
| B646L (p72) | Major capsid protein; used for genotyping | Highly conserved; identifies all 24 genotypes | Excellent; widely used as primary target [1] |
| E183L (p54) | Structural protein involved in virus attachment | Conserved with some variability; improves intragenotypic resolution | Good; validated in CRISPR/Cas12a systems [44] |
| K205R | Immunoregulatory function | Moderate conservation | Good; used in multi-target approaches [44] |
| C962R | Function in viral replication | Moderate conservation | Good; complementary target for enhanced detection [44] |
Table 3: Experimental LOD Values for ASFV Detection Methods
| Detection Method | Target Gene(s) | Reported LOD (copies/μL) | Time to Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRISPR/Cas13a-LFD | p72 | 10^1 copies/μL | <60 minutes | [32] |
| ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a | E183L, K205R, C962R | 10^1 copies/reaction | 60 minutes | [44] |
| Real-time PCR (reference) | B646L (p72) | Varies by protocol; typically 10^1-10^2 copies/μL | 60-90 minutes | [1] |
The determination of LOD in copies/μL for ASFV RAA-strip tests directly supports field deployment in outbreak scenarios. The experimental approaches outlined enable researchers to establish performance characteristics comparable to laboratory-based methods while maintaining the simplicity required for point-of-care applications [32] [44]. With typical LOD values of 10 copies/μL achievable through optimized RAA-CRISPR-lateral flow systems, these assays approach the sensitivity of real-time PCR while offering significant advantages in speed, cost, and technical requirements [1] [32]. The standardized LOD determination protocol ensures that developed assays meet the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) standards for ASFV diagnosis, facilitating their adoption in national control programs and international trade settings [1] [70].
Within the development of a Recombinase Aided Amplification combined with a nucleic acid test strip (RAA-strip) for the point-of-care (POC) detection of the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), confirming analytical specificity is a critical milestone. A key component of assay validation is rigorously demonstrating that the method can distinguish ASFV from other common porcine pathogens, thereby minimizing false-positive results in the field. This application note details the experimental protocols and data analysis procedures for evaluating the cross-reactivity of an ASFV RAA-strip, providing a framework for researchers and development professionals to ensure diagnostic reliability.
A well-designed cross-reactivity panel should include pathogens that are genetically related, cause similar clinical presentations, or are highly prevalent in swine populations. The panel must encompass a range of viruses to challenge the assay's specificity thoroughly [2] [30].
Table 1: Recommended Panel of Non-Target Pathogens for ASFV RAA-Strip Cross-Reactivity Testing
| Pathogen Type | Pathogen Name | Abbreviation | Genomic Material | Rationale for Inclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viral | Classical Swine Fever Virus | CSFV | RNA | Clinically similar hemorrhagic fever [2] [30] |
| Viral | Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus | PRRSV | RNA | Common endemic pathogen [6] [71] |
| Viral | Porcine Circovirus Type 2 | PCV2 | DNA | Widespread global prevalence [6] [71] |
| Viral | Porcine Circovirus Type 3 | PCV3 | DNA | Emerging pathogen [71] |
| Viral | Pseudorabies Virus | PRV | DNA | Common porcine herpesvirus [6] [55] |
| Viral | Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus | FMDV | RNA | Economically significant, vesicular disease [6] |
| Viral | Porcine Parvovirus | PPV | DNA | Common reproductive pathogen [6] [71] |
| Viral | Swine Vesicular Disease Virus | SVDV | RNA | Causes similar vesicular lesions [6] |
| Viral | Senecavirus A | SVA | RNA | Causes similar vesicular lesions [6] |
| Viral | Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus | PEDV | RNA | Common enteric pathogen [71] |
| Viral | Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus | TGEV | RNA | Common enteric pathogen [71] |
| Viral | Porcine Rotavirus | PoRV | RNA | Common enteric pathogen [72] |
| Bacterial | Brachyspira hyodysenteriae | - | DNA | Common bacterial cause of diarrhea [72] |
| Bacterial | Lawsonia intracellularis | - | DNA | Common bacterial cause of diarrhea [72] |
The following protocol is adapted from established RAA methods for ASFV and other porcine viruses [2] [6] [40].
1. Reaction Setup:
2. Amplification Incubation:
1. Preparation:
2. Detection:
3. Result Interpretation (within 5-15 minutes):
Figure 1: Workflow for RAA-Strip Cross-Reactivity Testing. This diagram outlines the step-by-step process from experimental setup to result interpretation.
In every run, include the following controls:
A specific ASFV RAA-strip will yield a positive result (T line and C line) only with the ASFV template. All non-target pathogens in the panel should yield a negative result (C line only), demonstrating no cross-reactivity. The following table summarizes expected quantitative and qualitative outcomes.
Table 2: Expected Results and Data Analysis for Cross-Reactivity Testing
| Tested Sample | Expected RAA-Strip Result (Visual) | Expected qPCR Ct Value (if performed) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASFV (Positive Control) | T Line + C Line | Ct < 35 (e.g.,) | True Positive |
| Nuclease-Free Water (Negative Control) | C Line Only | Undetected | True Negative |
| CSFV | C Line Only | Undetected by ASFV primers/probe | No Cross-Reactivity |
| PRRSV | C Line Only | Undetected by ASFV primers/probe | No Cross-Reactivity |
| PCV2 | C Line Only | Undetected by ASFV primers/probe | No Cross-Reactivity |
| FMDV | C Line Only | Undetected by ASFV primers/probe | No Cross-Reactivity |
| PEDV | C Line Only | Undetected by ASFV primers/probe | No Cross-Reactivity |
| Other Panel Pathogens | C Line Only | Undetected by ASFV primers/probe | No Cross-Reactivity |
Table 3: Essential Materials for RAA-Strip Cross-Reactivity Testing
| Item | Function & Specification | Example/Note |
|---|---|---|
| RAA Core Kit | Provides the freeze-dried enzyme powder (recombinase, SSB, polymerase) and reaction buffer essential for isothermal amplification. | e.g., Jiangsu Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co. [6] [40] |
| ASFV-specific Primers & Probe | Oligonucleotides designed to bind and amplify a conserved region of the ASFV genome (e.g., p72 gene B646L). Probes are dual-labeled (FAM/Biotin) for strip detection. | Primers: 30-35 bp; Probe: 46-52 bp with FAM and THF site [2] [30] [40] |
| Nucleic Acid Test Strips | Lateral flow strips for visual detection. Typically contain a streptavidin Test line (T) and an anti-FAM antibody Control line (C). | Commercial strips specific for FAM/Biotin amplicons [6] [40] |
| Dry Bath Incubator | To maintain a constant, low temperature (37-42°C) required for the RAA reaction. | Must be accurate to ± 1°C [71] |
| Cross-Reactivity Panel | Characterized genomic DNA/cDNA/RNA from a range of non-target porcine pathogens. | See Table 1 for recommended panel. Source from reference labs or ATCC. |
| Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit | For purifying template from clinical samples or cell culture if needed. | Suitable for viral DNA/RNA [72] |
This application note provides a detailed clinical validation of Recombinase-based Isothermal Amplification assays, specifically Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) and Recombinase-Aided Amplification (RAA), for the detection of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV). The data presented herein demonstrates excellent concordance with OIE-recommended qPCR methods across 152 characterized clinical samples, supporting the adoption of these rapid techniques for point-of-care diagnosis. The validation includes performance metrics, detailed experimental protocols, and technical resources to facilitate implementation in field and resource-limited settings.
African Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly contagious viral disease affecting domestic pigs and wild boars, with mortality rates approaching 100% in acute cases [73]. The disease poses a significant threat to the global swine industry, necessitating rapid and accurate diagnostic methods for effective control. While quantitative PCR (qPCR) remains the gold standard for ASFV detection, its requirement for sophisticated equipment and trained personnel limits its application in field settings [73] [74].
Recombinase-based isothermal amplification assays (RPA and RAA) have emerged as promising alternatives for point-of-care testing. These techniques rapidly amplify target DNA at constant temperatures (37-42°C) without the need for thermal cycling equipment [73] [75]. This document presents comprehensive clinical validation data establishing the concordance of RAA-strip methodology with standard qPCR for ASFV detection in field samples, framed within broader research on point-of-care diagnostics for ASFV.
The RPA and RAA assays evaluated in this validation demonstrated high analytical sensitivity when targeting the ASFV B646L gene (p72) [73].
Table 1: Analytical Sensitivity of Recombinase-Based Isothermal Amplification Assays for ASFV Detection
| Assay Type | Detection Limit (copies/reaction)* | Probability | Time to Detection | Amplification Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPA | 93.4 | 95% | 16 min | 39°C |
| RAA | 53.6 | 95% | 16 min | 39°C |
*Determined by probit analysis [73]
Both assays demonstrated universal specificity for all 24 genotypes of ASFV and showed no cross-reactivity with other common swine pathogens, including Classical swine fever virus (CSFV), Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), Pseudorabies virus, Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2), and Porcine Reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) [73].
The clinical performance of RPA and RAA was evaluated using a panel of 152 clinical samples previously characterized by OIE-recommended qPCR, including 20 weak positive samples (Ct value ⥠30) [73]. The sample panel represented various matrices: EDTA-blood, spleen, lung, lymph node, kidney, tonsil, liver, and brain.
Table 2: Clinical Performance of RPA and RAA Compared to OIE-Recommended qPCR
| Assay Type | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Specificity % (95% CI) | Kappa Value | Agreement Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPA | 96.59 (90.36â99.29) | 100 (94.40â100) | 0.960 | Excellent |
| RAA | 97.73 (92.03â99.72) | 100 (94.40â100) | 0.973 | Excellent |
The high kappa values (0.960 for RPA and 0.973 for RAA) indicate almost perfect agreement between the isothermal assays and the reference qPCR method [73]. This performance consistency across various sample types supports the utility of these assays for field applications where sample matrix diversity is expected.
Figure 1: RAA-Strip ASFV Detection Workflow
Prepare RAA Reaction Mix (50 μL total volume):
Initiate Amplification:
Lateral Flow Detection:
Table 3: Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for ASFV Detection from Field Samples
| Extraction Method | Technology | Throughput | Sensitivity | Suitability for Field Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Bead-based (taco) | Automated magnetic beads | High | Highest | Moderate |
| Magnetic Bead-based (MagMAX) | Automated magnetic beads | High | High | Moderate |
| Column-based (PowerSoil Pro) | Silica membrane | Moderate | Moderate | Low |
| Point-of-Care (M1) | Rapid extraction | Low | Lower | High |
For field applications, magnetic bead-based extractions provide superior sensitivity, though point-of-care methods offer greater practicality [76]. The choice of extraction method should balance sensitivity requirements with operational constraints.
Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for RAA-Strip ASFV Detection
| Reagent/Equipment | Function | Specifications | Example Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAA Basic Kit | Isothermal amplification | Contains recombinase, polymerase, SSB proteins | Qitian (Wuxi, China) |
| Primer/Probe Set | Target recognition | Specific to ASFV B646L (p72) gene | Custom synthesis |
| Lateral Flow Dipsticks | Result visualization | Detect biotin/FAM-labeled amplicons | Milenia Biotec |
| Portable Incubator | Temperature control | Maintains 39°C isothermal condition | Various |
| Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit | DNA purification | Magnetic bead or column-based | Multiple suppliers |
For distinguishing viable from inactivated virionsâparticularly valuable for disinfection efficacy monitoringâa Viability qPCR (V-qPCR) approach can be implemented using nucleic acid intercalating dyes [77].
Protocol Overview:
This method selectively inhibits amplification from inactivated viruses with compromised envelopes, providing more accurate assessment of infectivity status in environmental samples [77].
For increased specificity, RAA can be coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a technology:
This system achieves sensitivity of 10 copies/reaction while maintaining high specificity [44].
The validation data presented confirms that recombinase-based isothermal amplification assays (RPA/RAA) demonstrate excellent concordance with OIE-recommended qPCR methods for ASFV detection in clinical samples. The high sensitivity (96.59-97.73%) and specificity (100%) across diverse sample matrices, coupled with rapid turnaround time (16-20 minutes), position these assays as viable alternatives for point-of-care diagnosis.
The RAA-strip methodology offers particular advantages in resource-limited settings and field applications where conventional PCR equipment is unavailable. The ability to perform detection at constant temperatures without sophisticated instrumentation, while maintaining performance characteristics comparable to reference methods, addresses critical needs in ASF surveillance and outbreak management.
Future developments in lyophilized reagent formulations and integrated sample-to-answer systems will further enhance the field-deployability of these assays, strengthening global capacity for rapid ASF diagnosis and control.
Figure 2: Method Comparison and Application Contexts
African swine fever (ASF), caused by the African swine fever virus (ASFV), represents one of the most significant threats to global pork production due to its high mortality rate in domestic pigs and the absence of commercially available vaccines [78] [79]. Effective disease management relies heavily on rapid and accurate diagnostic techniques to facilitate immediate control interventions. Within this context, point-of-care (POC) testing has emerged as a critical tool for frontline defense against ASF outbreaks [1]. This application note provides a comparative analysis of four diagnostic technologiesâRecombinase Aided Amplification (RAA), real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP), and antigen-based immunochromatographic stripsâfor ASFV detection. We evaluate their technical specifications, operational requirements, and suitability for various diagnostic scenarios, with particular emphasis on the application of RAA-strip technology within POC environments.
The following table summarizes the key performance characteristics and operational requirements of the four ASFV detection methods discussed in this application note.
Table 1: Comparative analysis of ASFV detection methods
| Method | Principle | Time | Sensitivity | Equipment Needs | Key Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAA-Strip | Isothermal amplification with lateral flow detection | 15-20 min [12] | 200 copies/reaction [12] | Constant temperature block (37-42°C) [2] | Point-of-care testing, field deployment |
| qPCR | Thermal cycling with fluorescent detection | 1-2 hours [78] | 1.78-5.8 copies/μL [78] [80] | Thermal cycler, real-time detection system [1] | Laboratory confirmation, gold standard |
| LAMP | Isothermal amplification with visual/fluorescence readout | <30 min [81] | 1 copy/μL [81] | Water bath/block (60-70°C) [81] | Field-capable testing, resource-limited settings |
| Antigen Strip | Antigen-antibody interaction with visual detection | 5-10 min [39] | 10 ng/mL for p30 protein [39] | None | Rapid screening, pen-side testing |
Table 2: Target genes and proteins for ASFV detection
| Method | Primary Target | Additional Targets | Specificity Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAA-Strip | B646L (p72) gene [12] | - | No cross-reactivity with other swine viruses [12] |
| qPCR | B646L (p72) gene [78] [1] | E183L (p54), CP204L (p30), EP402R (CD2v) [78] | Can differentiate genotypes and gene-deleted strains [78] |
| LAMP | B646L (p72) gene [81] [79] | - | Specific for genotypes I and II; no cross-reactivity with common swine pathogens [81] |
| Antigen Strip | p30 protein [39] | p72, p54 [39] | Epitope: 58VKYDIVKSARIYAGQGY74 (p30) [39] |
The RAA-strip method combines recombinase-aided amplification with lateral flow dipstick detection, providing rapid results with minimal equipment [12].
Table 3: Reagent preparation for RAA-strip assay
| Component | Volume | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Rehydration Buffer | 25 μL | Provided with RAA kit |
| Forward Primer (10μM) | 1.0 μL | Target: B646L gene |
| Reverse Primer (10μM) | 1.0 μL | Biotin-labeled |
| Probe (10μM) | 0.5 μL | FAM-labeled |
| Magnesium Acetate (280mM) | 1.0 μL | Activation reagent |
| DNA Template | 2.0 μL | Extracted or heat-lysed sample |
| Nuclease-free Water | To 50 μL | Final volume |
Procedure:
The qPCR method remains the gold standard for ASFV detection due to its exceptional sensitivity and quantification capabilities [78] [1].
Reaction Setup:
DNA Extraction Methods:
LAMP provides highly sensitive detection with minimal equipment requirements [81] [79].
Primer Design:
Reaction Composition:
Amplification Conditions:
Detection Methods:
Antigen strips detect viral proteins directly, providing the fastest time-to-result among all methods [39].
Strip Configuration:
Testing Procedure:
Table 4: Essential research reagents for ASFV detection development
| Reagent/Category | Specific Examples | Function/Application |
|---|---|---|
| Polymerases | Bst DNA Polymerase (LAMP), Recombinase (RAA), Taq Polymerase (qPCR) | DNA amplification under various conditions |
| Primers & Probes | p72 (B646L) primers, p30 (CP204L) probes, F3/B3/FIP/BIP primers (LAMP) | Target-specific sequence recognition |
| Antibodies | Anti-p30 mAb 2A5, Anti-p72 mAb, Rabbit polyclonal antibodies [39] | Antigen capture and detection |
| Signal Systems | Blue latex microspheres, FAM/BHQ systems, HRP conjugates, SYBR Green | Visualization of detection events |
| Nucleic Acid Extraction | Magnetic bead kits, Silica columns, Mightyprep reagent [80] | Sample preparation and purification |
| Lateral Flow Components | Nitrocellulose membranes, Sample pads, Conjugate pads, Absorbent pads [39] | Test strip assembly and function |
The following diagram illustrates the decision-making process for selecting the appropriate ASFV detection method based on testing requirements and available resources.
The comparative analysis presented in this application note demonstrates that each ASFV detection technology offers distinct advantages for specific application scenarios. RAA-strip technology emerges as a balanced solution for point-of-care testing, combining reasonable sensitivity (200 copies/reaction) with rapid results (15-20 minutes) and minimal equipment requirements [2] [12]. While qPCR remains the gold standard for laboratory confirmation due to its superior sensitivity and quantitative capabilities [78] [1], LAMP provides exceptional field-deployable sensitivity [81] [80], and antigen strips offer the fastest time-to-result for initial screening [39]. The choice of method should be guided by specific diagnostic needs, available infrastructure, and the intended application context. For comprehensive ASF surveillance programs, a layered approach utilizing multiple methods often provides the most effective strategy for rapid detection and confirmation.
Recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique that has emerged as a powerful tool for molecular diagnostics, particularly in point-of-care (POC) settings. This technology enables rapid, specific, and sensitive detection of pathogen DNA or RNA at constant temperatures ranging from 37°C to 42°C, eliminating the need for sophisticated thermal cycling equipment. The fundamental principle of RAA involves three key enzymatic components: a recombinase that forms complexes with primers and facilitates strand invasion at homologous sequences, a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) that stabilizes the displaced DNA strands, and a DNA polymerase that initiates synthesis from the 3'-end of the primers [34]. This synergistic action allows for exponential amplification of target nucleic acids within 20-30 minutes, making it ideally suited for field-deployable diagnostic platforms.
In the context of African swine fever virus (ASFV) detection, RAA technology offers significant advantages over conventional PCR-based methods. ASF is a highly contagious viral disease affecting domestic pigs and wild boars, with mortality rates approaching 100% in acute cases. The current absence of effective vaccines or treatments makes early detection crucial for implementing control measures and preventing economic losses in the swine industry [44] [34]. Traditional laboratory-based methods such as quantitative PCR (qPCR), while sensitive and specific, require sophisticated instrumentation, stable electrical supply, and trained personnel, which are often unavailable in resource-limited settings or remote areas where ASF outbreaks frequently occur. RAA-based assays address these limitations by providing a rapid, cost-effective, and equipment-minimal alternative that can be deployed at the point of care, enabling early detection and timely intervention during ASF outbreaks.
The integration of RAA with lateral flow strips (RAA-strip) represents a particularly promising approach for ASFV detection in field conditions. This combination leverages the amplification power of RAA with the visual readout capability of lateral flow strips, allowing for result interpretation without specialized equipment. Furthermore, the recent convergence of RAA with CRISPR/Cas systems has unlocked new possibilities for developing highly specific and sensitive POC diagnostics for ASFV, with the potential to distinguish between different ASFV genotypes and even detect multiple genomic targets simultaneously [44]. This application note provides a comprehensive review of commercially available RAA reagents and platforms, with a specific focus on their application for ASFV detection, and offers detailed protocols for implementing these technologies in both laboratory and field settings.
The market for RAA reagents has expanded significantly, with several manufacturers offering specialized kits tailored to different detection formats and applications. These kits typically contain all necessary components for nucleic acid amplification, including recombinase enzymes, single-stranded DNA-binding proteins, DNA polymerases, reaction buffers, and nucleotide mixes. Most manufacturers also offer compatible primer/probe sets for specific pathogens or custom design services for novel targets. The table below summarizes the key commercially available RAA reagents and their characteristics:
Table 1: Commercial RAA Reagents and Kits for Molecular Diagnostics
| Manufacturer | Kit Name | Application Format | Reaction Temperature | Reaction Time | Detection Limit for ASFV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qitian (Wuxi, China) | RAA Basic Kit | Fluorescence, Lateral flow, Gel electrophoresis | 37-42°C | 15-30 minutes | 53.6 copies/reaction [34] |
| TwistDx (Cambridge, UK) | RPA Basic Kit | Fluorescence, Lateral flow, Gel electrophoresis | 37-42°C | 15-30 minutes | 93.4 copies/reaction [34] |
| AmpFuture Biotechnology | RAA Basic Nucleic Acid Amplification Kit | Fluorescence, Lateral flow | 37°C | 20 minutes | Not specified |
| AmpFuture Biotechnology | RAA Basic Nucleic Acid Amplification Kit (Colloidal Gold) | Lateral flow strip | 37°C | 20 minutes | Not specified [82] |
| Suzhou GenDx Biotech | ERA Nucleic Acid Amplification Kit | Fluorescence, Lateral flow | 37-42°C | 20 minutes | 10 copies/μL [44] |
The RAA Basic Kit from Qitian and RPA Basic Kit from TwistDx represent the core reagents for recombinase-based amplification, with demonstrated efficacy for ASFV detection. The Qitian RAA kit has shown a slightly higher analytical sensitivity for ASFV detection (53.6 copies per reaction at 95% probability) compared to the TwistDx RPA kit (93.4 copies per reaction) when targeting the ASFV B646L (p72) gene [34]. Both kits support multiple detection formats, including real-time fluorescence monitoring, lateral flow strip visualization, and conventional gel electrophoresis, providing flexibility for different application scenarios and resource settings.
Specialized kits such as the RAA Basic Nucleic Acid Amplification Kit (Colloidal Gold) from AmpFuture Biotechnology are specifically designed for lateral flow strip detection, incorporating compatible probes labeled with biotin and FAM or other haptens for convenient visual readout [82]. Similarly, the ERA (Enzymatic Recombinase Amplification) Nucleic Acid Amplification Kit from Suzhao GenDx Biotech has been successfully integrated with CRISPR/Cas12a systems for highly sensitive ASFV detection, achieving detection limits as low as 10 copies per reaction when targeting multiple ASFV genes including E183L, K205R, and C962R [44]. This integration with CRISPR technology significantly enhances detection specificity through the programmability of crRNA guides, while maintaining the operational simplicity of isothermal amplification.
The convergence of RAA with CRISPR/Cas systems represents the cutting edge of POC molecular diagnostics, combining rapid isothermal amplification with the exceptional specificity of RNA-guided Cas nucleases. Several manufacturers now offer integrated kits or compatible components for developing RAA-CRISPR assays. The key components of these systems include:
For ASFV detection, researchers have successfully developed multiplexed RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a assays capable of simultaneously targeting three different ASFV genes (E183L, K205R, and C962R) with a sensitivity of 10 copies per reaction and complete detection within 60 minutes [44]. This multi-target approach enhances detection reliability and provides a built-in control mechanism for identifying potential genetic variants or escape mutants. The CRISPR/Cas12a-specific nucleic acid detection strips from BaoYing TongHui Biotechnology have been effectively employed for visual interpretation of RAA-CRISPR assay results, providing a equipment-free readout suitable for field applications [82].
The analytical and clinical performance of RAA platforms for ASFV detection has been extensively evaluated in multiple studies, with direct comparisons to OIE-recommended qPCR methods serving as the gold standard. The table below summarizes the performance characteristics of different RAA-based approaches for ASFV detection:
Table 2: Performance Comparison of RAA-Based Platforms for ASFV Detection
| Platform/Assay | Target Gene | Analytical Sensitivity | Clinical Sensitivity | Clinical Specificity | Time to Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAA (Qitian) | B646L (p72) | 53.6 copies/reaction | 97.73% (92.03-99.72%) | 100% (94.40-100%) | 16-30 minutes [34] |
| RPA (TwistDx) | B646L (p72) | 93.4 copies/reaction | 96.59% (90.36-99.29%) | 100% (94.40-100%) | 16-30 minutes [34] |
| ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a | E183L, K205R, C962R | 10 copies/reaction | 100% (11/11 positive samples) | 100% (no cross-reactivity) | 60 minutes [44] |
| RT-RAA (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) | M gene | 159 copies/reaction (95% CI) | 100% (265 clinical samples) | 100% (no cross-reactivity) | 30 minutes [83] |
The performance data demonstrate that RAA assays targeting the ASFV B646L (p72) gene exhibit excellent clinical sensitivity (96.59-97.73%) and perfect specificity (100%) when validated against a panel of 152 clinical samples including EDTA-blood, spleen, lung, lymph node, kidney, tonsil, liver, and brain tissues [34]. Notably, these assays maintained high sensitivity even with weak positive samples (Ct value ⥠30), which is crucial for early detection during the initial stages of infection when viral loads may be low.
The integration of RAA with CRISPR/Cas12a technology further enhances detection sensitivity, with the ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform achieving a detection limit of 10 copies per reaction for ASFV [44]. This represents approximately 5-10 fold improvement in sensitivity compared to standalone RAA/RPA assays. The CRISPR-enhanced system also provides exceptional specificity due to the dual recognition mechanism requiring both successful RAA amplification and crRNA-guided target recognition by Cas12a. This dual verification system effectively minimizes false-positive results that may occur due to non-specific amplification in traditional isothermal assays.
The operational characteristics of RAA platforms significantly influence their suitability for different diagnostic settings. Key considerations include equipment requirements, reaction conditions, and result interpretation methods:
Table 3: Operational Characteristics of RAA Detection Platforms
| Platform Format | Equipment Requirements | Reaction Conditions | Result Interpretation | Suitable Setting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescence RAA | Portable real-time fluorometer or standard real-time PCR instrument | 39°C for 15-30 minutes | Real-time fluorescence curves, Ct values | Field laboratories with power access |
| Lateral Flow RAA | Dry bath or heating block, no reader required | 37-42°C for 15-20 minutes, then strip immersion | Visual band appearance | Resource-limited field settings |
| RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a Fluorescence | Portable fluorometer or blue light transilluminator | 37°C for 20 min RAA + 30 min Cas12a detection | Fluorescence intensity under blue light | Intermediate laboratories |
| RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a Lateral Flow | Heating block, no electricity required | 37°C for 20 min RAA + 30 min Cas12a detection, then strip immersion | Visual band appearance | Remote field settings |
Fluorescence-based RAA assays offer quantitative capabilities and higher throughput but require portable fluorometers such as the Genie II or III from OptiGene or comparable devices. In contrast, lateral flow RAA formats provide the simplest readout system, requiring only a heating block for incubation and visual interpretation of test and control lines. The RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a platforms combine the sensitivity of RAA with the specificity of CRISPR, with fluorescence detection offering higher sensitivity while lateral flow detection provides equipment-free operation [44].
Recent advances in portable detection systems have further enhanced the field applicability of RAA platforms. Studies have validated the use of RAA with portable real-time PCR cyclers such as IndiField, Liberty16, and UF-300 Genechecker, which are specifically designed for field use with minimal power requirements [84]. These systems enable full molecular testing in remote locations, with total processing times (including nucleic acid extraction and amplification) of 30-60 minutes for up to eight samples simultaneously.
This protocol describes the standard procedure for detecting ASFV using RAA reagents with lateral flow strip readout, targeting the B646L (p72) gene based on established methods [34].
Prepare the RAA reaction mix according to the following formulation:
Transfer the mixture to a reaction tube containing the RAA pellet.
Add 2.5 μL of magnesium acetate (280 mM) to the tube lid, then close the tube tightly.
Centrifuge the tube briefly (3-5 seconds) to mix the magnesium acetate with the reaction mixture.
Immediately place the tube in a heating block or dry bath preheated to 39°C.
Incubate for 15-20 minutes at 39°C.
After amplification, dilute 5-10 μL of the RAA reaction product in 100 μL of lateral flow assay buffer.
Insert a lateral flow strip into the diluted product and allow capillary action to develop the strip.
Wait 5-10 minutes for bands to appear.
Interpret results:
The entire procedure, from sample preparation to result interpretation, can be completed within 30-40 minutes, making it suitable for rapid field testing.
This protocol describes an integrated ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for highly specific and sensitive detection of ASFV targeting multiple genes, based on established methods [44].
Identify conserved regions within ASFV E183L, K205R, and C962R genes through sequence alignment.
Design crRNAs with the following considerations:
Design ERA primers flanking the crRNA target regions:
Prepare the ERA pre-amplification mix:
Transfer the mix to a tube containing ERA amplification pellet.
Add 2 μL of ERA activator to the tube lid, close tightly, and centrifuge briefly to mix.
Incubate at 37°C for 20 minutes for ERA amplification.
Without opening the tube, prepare the CRISPR/Cas12a detection mix:
After ERA amplification, briefly centrifuge the tube and add the CRISPR/Cas12a detection mix directly to the same tube.
Mix by pipetting and incubate at 37°C for 30 minutes.
Visualize results under blue light (fluorescence) or using lateral flow strips.
This integrated protocol enables highly specific detection of ASFV with a sensitivity of 10 copies per reaction within 60 minutes, including both amplification and detection steps.
The following diagram illustrates the fundamental mechanism of recombinase-aided amplification:
RAA Basic Mechanism Diagram
The following diagram illustrates the complete workflow for ASFV detection using the integrated RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system:
RAA-CRISPR ASFV Detection Workflow
The successful implementation of RAA-based ASFV detection requires a comprehensive set of reagents, instruments, and consumables. The following table details the essential components of the research toolkit:
Table 4: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for RAA-Based ASFV Detection
| Category | Specific Item | Function/Purpose | Example Products/Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Amplification Reagents | RAA/RPA Basic Kit | Provides essential enzymes and buffers for isothermal amplification | Qitian RAA Kit, TwistDx RPA Kit |
| Target-specific primers | Binds to complementary ASFV sequences for specific amplification | Custom-designed, synthesized by commercial providers | |
| Labeled probes | Enables detection of amplified products in real-time or lateral flow formats | FAM/biotin-labeled probes for lateral flow | |
| CRISPR Components | Cas12a enzyme | RNA-guided nuclease with trans-cleavage activity for detection | LbaCas12a, AsCas12a from various suppliers |
| crRNAs | Guides Cas12a to specific target sequences for recognition | Custom-designed targeting ASFV E183L, K205R, C962R | |
| ssDNA reporters | Fluorescent or labeled molecules cleaved by activated Cas12a | FAM-TTATT-BHQ1, FAM-UUUUU-BHQ1 | |
| Detection Systems | Lateral flow strips | Visual detection of labeled amplicons | Milenia HybriDetect, CRISPR/Cas12a-specific strips |
| Portable fluorometers | Quantitative fluorescence detection in field settings | Genie II/III, small portable readers | |
| Blue light transilluminators | Visualization of fluorescent signals | Portable 465-470 nm LED devices | |
| Sample Preparation | Nucleic acid extraction kits | Isolation of DNA from clinical samples | Manual field kits (TripleE system), column-based kits |
| Rapid nucleic acid releaser | Direct sample preparation without extraction | AmpFuture Rapid Nucleic Acid Releaser | |
| Instrumentation | Portable heaters | Maintaining constant temperature for reactions | Dry baths, heating blocks, battery-powered incubators |
| Portable centrifuges | Brief spinning of reaction tubes | Mini centrifuges, battery-operated | |
| Controls | Positive control plasmids | Verification of assay performance | pUC57-ASFV constructs with target genes |
| Negative control samples | Monitoring contamination | Nuclease-free water, ASFV-negative pig DNA |
This comprehensive toolkit enables researchers to establish complete RAA-based detection systems for ASFV in various settings, from well-equipped laboratories to resource-limited field environments. The selection of specific components should be guided by the intended application, available resources, and required performance characteristics.
RAA technology has established itself as a robust, sensitive, and field-deployable platform for ASFV detection, addressing critical needs in disease surveillance and outbreak management. The commercial availability of standardized reagents and compatible detection platforms has democratized molecular testing, making sophisticated diagnostic capabilities accessible beyond traditional laboratory settings. The continuous evolution of RAA systems, particularly through integration with CRISPR/Cas technologies, promises even greater specificity, sensitivity, and multiplexing capabilities for future ASFV diagnostics.
The ideal RAA platform for ASFV detection must balance analytical performance with operational practicality. While basic RAA formats provide adequate sensitivity and specificity for most field applications, the emerging RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a systems offer enhanced performance through dual recognition mechanisms that minimize false positives. The future development of lyophilized, ready-to-use RAA and RAA-CRISPR formulations will further simplify field deployment, eliminating cold chain requirements and reducing procedural complexity. Additionally, the creation of multiplexed RAA panels capable of simultaneously detecting ASFV and differentiating it from other common swine pathogens (such as classical swine fever virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, and porcine circovirus) would provide tremendous value for comprehensive differential diagnosis in field settings.
As RAA technology continues to mature, we anticipate increased regulatory approval of commercial RAA-based ASFV tests, wider adoption by veterinary diagnostic laboratories, and ultimately, greater integration of these point-of-care tools into national ASF control and eradication programs. The ongoing development of portable, connected devices with data capture and sharing capabilities will further enhance the utility of RAA testing by enabling real-time epidemiological surveillance and rapid coordinated responses to ASF outbreaks, ultimately contributing to global food security and sustainable swine production.
RAA-strip technology represents a paradigm shift in ASFV diagnostics, successfully merging the high sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification with the simplicity and speed required for point-of-care testing. The synthesis of evidence confirms that well-optimized RAA assays can achieve detection limits as low as 10^3 copies/μL with high specificity, providing results in 20-30 minutes at a constant temperature of 37-42°Câa significant advantage over lab-bound PCR. For future directions, the integration of RAA with novel detection systems like CRISPR/Cas12a promises even greater specificity and multiplexing capabilities. The primary challenge remains the management of emerging ASFV variants, necessitating ongoing surveillance and periodic reassessment of primer-probe targets. Widespread adoption of this technology will empower frontline veterinarians and farmers with rapid, accurate diagnostic tools, fundamentally enhancing outbreak containment and contributing to the global control of African swine fever.